Subject:
|
Re: One angry man's complaint about the "MOC highlight"
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.space
|
Date:
|
Thu, 28 Apr 2005 01:19:46 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2471 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.space, Keith Goldman wrote:
> In lugnet.space, Leonard Hoffman wrote:
> > actually i was gonna pull the old "its the end of my first semester of grad
> > school and i was writing a few papers, resigning from lugnet, and just busy all
> > around."
>
> My post had nothing to do with the speed at which you update the MOC Highlight,
> you are confusing that with my rant from a few months ago. In fact, you have
> been great about keeping it updated.
No you're right. I read a bit too quickly because I've been a little stressed
lately. Your post was about me spotlighting someone who SHOULDN"T be
spotlighted.
I don't care about where Tom posted the FUGLI. Some manufactured rivalry
between lugnet and csf is stupid, in my opinion. To me, the highlight is about
quality mocs.
if that makes me an elitist, then fine. i dont care.
> > this REALLY is NOT the way to bring something like this up. thanks for the vote
> > of no confidence
>
> It isn't? Should I have taken it to the hidden forum on CSF? Sure I could have
> emailed you, but at least this way there is no mistaking what I said, for better
> or worse. It isn't like I'm derailing the overwhelming activity in .Space, and
> I know for a fact that I'm not the only one who feels this way. You've got it
> all wrong Lenny, I have every confidence in you.
Maybe an email would have been nicer, instead of calling me out in public.
ANd yeah, maybe id like to see that list of everyone ive been passing up because
they're not in the 'clubhouse'.. that would convince me a little bit more.
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: One angry man's complaint about the "MOC highlight"
|
| this is supposed to be fun. the moc highlight isnt something worth ranting and raving about. keith thinks im a part of the space elite, and that i only put other members of the space elite on the highlight. fine. he thinks im doing a bad job. okay. (...) (20 years ago, 28-Apr-05, to lugnet.space)
| | | Re: One angry man's complaint about the "MOC highlight"
|
| (...) Actually, I questioned (questioned) whether or not he should be spotlighted when he doesnt post the moc to Lugnet, then I went off on an anti CSF rant. (...) Fair enough, all I was looking for was a little explanation...well, that and poke at (...) (20 years ago, 28-Apr-05, to lugnet.space)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: One angry man's complaint about the "MOC highlight"
|
| (...) My post had nothing to do with the speed at which you update the MOC Highlight, you are confusing that with my rant from a few months ago. In fact, you have been great about keeping it updated. (...) It isn't? Should I have taken it to the (...) (20 years ago, 27-Apr-05, to lugnet.space)
|
35 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
