Subject:
|
Re: Gargamel: Deepspace Freighter
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.space
|
Date:
|
Sat, 5 Feb 2005 10:00:04 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1305 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.space, George Haberberger wrote:
| |
In lugnet.announce.moc, Tony Hafner wrote:
| |
Gargamel- the answer to all of your cargo-hauling needs... as long as the
load isn’t too big. This ship features living space for 4, a small
maintenance and cargo-hauling vehicle, and big engines.
|
Tony,
This rocks, it’s rare to see a ship built going up, instead of back and
forth, if you know what I mean.
|
I kept thinking I was going to run into structural problems, but this thing is
pretty sturdy. I did resort to some cross-bracing on the upper half, though I’m
not certain it was necessary- but that gave me some ideas for future use. It
was nice to do more of a “rocket ship” style here.
| |
I’d love to see more of your wall attachments, round or cylindrical walls
looks so much better than a rectangle for a spaceship, but I have yet to
find a solution that I really like.
|
Anything you can do to break up the blockiness is good. I plan to get some
construction pics up on my site, probably in a week or so.
| |
Great greebling too, and the vectorable engines rock. I’m glad you got past
your builder’s block.
|
Heh- me too! This was taking up a lot of shelf space, and wasn’t even done. I
have to thank Mark Sandlin again for the greebling. While he didn’t actually do
a large percentage of the greebs on the ship, he taught me how it is done.
--
Tony Hafner
www.hafhead.com
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Gargamel: Deepspace Freighter
|
| (...) Tony, This rocks, it's rare to see a ship built going up, instead of back and forth, if you know what I mean. I'd love to see more of your wall attachments, round or cylindrical walls looks so much better than a rectangle for a spaceship, but (...) (19 years ago, 4-Feb-05, to lugnet.space, FTX)
|
9 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
