 | | Re: The INRI Deep Space Starfighter: Salvation is at hand!
|
|
Memo to all the .space-lurkers out there....if you are hesitant to post because you think your moc will not get any attention, just attach J.C. to the hull and watch the responses flood in. You'll get the people who are offended, people who will in (...) (21 years ago, 3-Oct-04, to lugnet.space, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: The INRI Deep Space Starfighter: Salvation is at hand!
|
|
(...) Seperated for emphais and I THINK it would be (...) which isn't really making it FOR ME. (...) Capitalization emphasis added. (...) Dude, perhaps you should think about reading sentences in their entiriety, and in the context of surrounding (...) (21 years ago, 3-Oct-04, to lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: The INRI Deep Space Starfighter: Salvation is at hand!
|
|
(...) but it's (...) would be (...) MOCs. (...) Dan, slap me for saying so, but I think you need to work a little subtlety into your critiques. How about saying that you would prefer something more ornate instead of declaring that it would be (...) (21 years ago, 3-Oct-04, to lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Oh relax, Peter!
|
|
(...) Can't you appreciate a little satire? After all, if you can't laugh at yourself, you're just leaving the job to others. Dave (21 years ago, 3-Oct-04, to lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: The INRI Deep Space Starfighter: Salvation is at hand!
|
|
(...) Is that a warning 'Itsy Nuclear Reactor Inside' ? (...) Landing gear ? You mean it doesn't just embed in the mud like Genesis ? (...) Is that the Hand of god ? (...) Was that an easy conversion for them to make ? (...) pete.w (21 years ago, 3-Oct-04, to lugnet.space, FTX)
|
