 | | Re: The INRI Deep Space Starfighter: Salvation is at hand! —Daniel Rubin
|
| | | (...) SNIP (...) Dude, you need to try and work a little subtlety into MOCs like this. The initial idea when I built the Rapier was to have a basically cross-shaped fighter, but there's more to it than that. A cathedral is cross shaped, but it's not (...) (20 years ago, 3-Oct-04, to lugnet.space, FTX)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: The INRI Deep Space Starfighter: Salvation is at hand! —David Simmons
|
| | | | (...) but it's (...) would be (...) MOCs. (...) Dan, slap me for saying so, but I think you need to work a little subtlety into your critiques. How about saying that you would prefer something more ornate instead of declaring that it would be (...) (20 years ago, 3-Oct-04, to lugnet.space)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: The INRI Deep Space Starfighter: Salvation is at hand! —Daniel Rubin
|
| | | | (...) Seperated for emphais and I THINK it would be (...) which isn't really making it FOR ME. (...) Capitalization emphasis added. (...) Dude, perhaps you should think about reading sentences in their entiriety, and in the context of surrounding (...) (20 years ago, 3-Oct-04, to lugnet.space)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: The INRI Deep Space Starfighter: Salvation is at hand! —David Simmons
|
| | | | I'm not trying to say you can't have an opinion, however I am saying that your opinion is largely negative, so why not accentuate the positive instead? Dave (20 years ago, 4-Oct-04, to lugnet.space)
|
| | | | |
