To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.spaceOpen lugnet.space in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Space / 35080
35079  |  35081
Subject: 
Bad news for NASA
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.geek, lugnet.space
Followup-To: 
lugnet.off-topic.geek
Date: 
Wed, 21 Jul 2004 21:23:02 GMT
Viewed: 
256 times
  
And you thought the brouhaha over the HST was intense... this one will turn into a big old catfight before it’s over.

http://www.upi.com/view.cfm?StoryID=20040721-120555-7068r

Basically, the House Appropriations subcommittee in charge of NASA’s budget just gave a big thumbs-down to the space agency’s budget request. Not only did they essentially axe every single new space initiative budget item request, they sliced off more of NASA’s traditional budget. Bush had asked for $16.2 billion for FY 2005, an $866 million increase over 2004’s budget, but the subcommittee only approved $15.149 billion.

Thanks so much. Space exploration, apparently, is over their heads. So to speak.

The “good” news (highly qualified) is that this isn’t the final decision. But it’s apparently gonna get uglier before it gets better. For serious space-head geeks like me, this is a (not entirely unexpected) blow to the solar plexus (note to House subcommittee members: that means “gut”, fellas).

“The subcommittee even killed the small, $20 million down payment on a new NASA project to offer prizes to achieve new space technologies and systems.” Now that’s just stupid. The X-Prize generated a ton of positive awareness on affordable space exploration, and some bright boy at NASA put 2+2 together and proposed a similar prize incentive - a paltry sum, compared to their regular budget, but substantial enough to grab attention. Poof - gone.

So the one bright spot of the current administration - increasing space exploration funding - is being eviscerated by (unprintably shortsighted) bureaucrats and left out to dry.

It’s enough to make one wonder if ABS bricks could be made airtight, and withstand reentry somehow...

Kelly



Message has 3 Replies:
  Re: Bad news for NASA
 
(...) That sucks. That was a great way to potentially generate billions of dollars in NASA R&D without having to spend tax dollars to pay for it all. It also allows a greater variety of ideas to be explored, since noone has to justify experimenting (...) (20 years ago, 21-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, FTX)
  Re: Bad news for NASA
 
(...) All those new initiatives were a neat idea, but as you can see Shuttle has eaten them alive. Congress voted $4.3 billion for a shuttle that won't fly before that money is all gone. It has always done this because our lawmakers are addicted to (...) (20 years ago, 22-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, FTX)
  Re: Bad news for NASA
 
(...) It's not over yet. Look at House Majority Leader Tom DeLay's comments in these articles: (2 URLs) He's quoted as calling the proposed NASA budget cuts as "unacceptable" and followed that by saying, "It would be very hard to get this bill to (...) (20 years ago, 22-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, FTX)

5 Messages in This Thread:



Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR