|
In lugnet.off-topic.geek, Kelly McKiernan wrote:
All those new initiatives were a neat idea, but as you can see Shuttle has eaten
them alive. Congress voted $4.3 billion for a shuttle that wont fly before that
money is all gone. It has always done this because our lawmakers are addicted to
voting money for their home states, and Shuttle has been pork since Nixon. New
initiatives are a risk, because they threaten some of the largest Shuttle
handouts. No matter how irrational Shuttle might be.
The bill is also supposed to pay for the completion of our obligations to the
ISS. This too is a boondoggle.
Arguing about what this means - somebody has it in for manned spaceflight for
instance - involves a fatal assumption. That is that NASA offers any hope of
furthering that goal. If you think the answer is no, as I have been convinced,
then shutting down NASAs manned flight operations and privatizing its assets
would a good thing for space. Some of the hearings under way are leading to
cracking it apart, but Im not holding my breath.
None of this is meant to reflect on NASAs unmanned exploration directives which
have done so much on less money.
The Russians are making jokes about NASA going out of business on $20 billion a
year.
-Erik
http://appropriations.house.gov/
Subcommittee on Veterans etc. made this vote
If one of your congresscritters is on this subcommittee, write them a letter.
Bite the hand that feeds your neighborhood a $7.3 million NASA supercomputer
facility. (ranking member Mollohan, Fairmont WV.)
|
|
Message has 1 Reply: | | Re: Bad news for NASA
|
| (...) Shuttle = great idea in 1972, ridiculous albatross in 2004. You're undoubtedly right about the $4.3B being spent before a single SRB is lit. What really bugs me is the systematic way they're trying to kill all manned spaceflight by unfunding (...) (20 years ago, 22-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, FTX)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Bad news for NASA
|
| And you thought the brouhaha over the HST was intense... this one will turn into a big old catfight before it's over. (URL) Basically, the House Appropriations subcommittee in charge of NASA's budget just gave a big thumbs-down to the space agency's (...) (20 years ago, 21-Jul-04, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, lugnet.space, FTX)
|
5 Messages in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|