 | | Re: Tri-Wing Fighter Redux
|
|
(...) Yes, the space modification for the fighter is in the upgrade package. It's a shield that holds in air so the prop can use it (the air) to fly thru. (...) I was just reading about that last night. How odd. But really. Not all air vehicles in (...) (21 years ago, 19-May-04, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: Tri-Wing Fighter Redux
|
|
(...) And what a fiasco it was! So big it made the .Space Timeline -Joseph (21 years ago, 18-May-04, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: Tri-Wing Fighter Redux
|
|
(...) Say, I hear tell there's this "Terran Federation" what's looking for a few ships of some kind--*any* kind--and maybe they would be interested in buying some. I mean, they *do* have three thousand seven hundred somethingorother sectors to (...) (21 years ago, 18-May-04, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: Tri-Wing Fighter Redux
|
|
(...) But, but, there's no air in space for the propeller to work. "Oh no, not again..." Does anyone else here remember the great ".space-spaceships-m...ave-wings" fiasco about 2-3 years ago? There was a contest even... :] KDJ ___...___ LUGNETer (...) (21 years ago, 18-May-04, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: Tri-Wing Fighter Redux
|
|
Well, it's certainly a very good representation of the tri-plane. Doesn't go with Star Wars much, but it's neat none the less. (21 years ago, 18-May-04, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: Friend or foe?
|
|
(...) Thanks for clarifying, Tyler. -Joseph (21 years ago, 18-May-04, to lugnet.space, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Tri-Wing Fighter Redux
|
|
(...) Answers to questions. It was made for the Rebellion. (Plus, it has Rebellion plates on the wings.) To provide thrust to fly. Because it's an open cockpit aircraft. It can't hover, but it can fly very slow. My MOCs never do. (...) Thanks. (...) (21 years ago, 18-May-04, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: Friend or foe?
|
|
(...) sorry about that, I was mixing two or three different storylines without knowing it (21 years ago, 18-May-04, to lugnet.space, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Moonbase: Nailing down Moonway and Rail Standard
|
|
(...) That's not quite what I meant. I was saying that you can't have a single line of track that has sections that follow the current official layout standard and other sections that follow the proposed idea of riding down the seams between (...) (21 years ago, 18-May-04, to lugnet.space, lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Large Intrepid-class Space MOC - Never seen as big a ship posted yet
|
|
(...) Hi Jordan, parts were more, time was less, closer to about 6-7 months. I had some delay I couldn't help because during the building I was ordering and waiting for parts. Lee (21 years ago, 17-May-04, to lugnet.space)
|
