 | | Re: Spaceworld v. 1.0
|
| (...) other SW packaging...NOT! If you think that the blue and brown are reflections of anything but sky and ground from a planet surface -- well, you're just not facing the facts of how this air-brushed chrome look came about. Trust me on this. I (...) (24 years ago, 25-Jul-00, to lugnet.space)
| | | | | Re: Spaceworld v. 1.0
|
| (...) I'm aware of how the airbrushed chrome look came about. I was simply making a point that even the Star Wars folks have used the sky-and-ground chrome effect. Like I said, it's still being decided whether to use it. ~Mark (24 years ago, 25-Jul-00, to lugnet.space)
| | | | | Re: Spaceworld v. 1.0
|
| (...) That's the worst argument for a doing a thing as I've ever heard. So because some nut in the art department for *gizmo* toys decides its cool to do chrome lettering this way, you follow suit? You can do better than that, Mark! In fact, i've (...) (24 years ago, 25-Jul-00, to lugnet.space)
| | | | | Re: Spaceworld v. 1.0
|
| (...) Thanks for the vote of confidence. I didn't say that's why *I* did the chrome thing. I already said a couple posts ago that I just tossed it in there to make it look flashy.... but anyway. (...) Ok, I'm sorry if I over-reacted to anything. (...) (24 years ago, 25-Jul-00, to lugnet.space)
| | | | | Re: Spaceworld v. 1.0 - Logo
|
| Mark, Well, I like the logo, and the lettering, it gives it a nice look. Outside of using the strict white lettering of the Classic series, I think it is appropriate for the site. The only other thing it might be is a techy look, but those are (...) (24 years ago, 25-Jul-00, to lugnet.space)
| |
