 | | SPLASH —Mark Sandlin
| | | | For uncovering clandestine Eastern Block activities. SPLASH: Surveillance Probe Longrange Advanced Superfighter Hypersonic (URL) -Grand Admiral and Keeper of Fleebnorks (URL) "Adopt a fleebnork. They're DYING!" -Sally Struthers P.S. Thanks to Chris (...) (21 years ago, 30-Aug-03, to lugnet.space, FTX)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: SPLASH —Mladen Pejic
| | | | | | (...) Mark, this is another fine MOC from you. I like the sleek shape, that is augmented greatly by the use of those curved slopes. The engines look, IMO, perfect for such a craft too. The colour scheme is also good. However, I'm just a little (...) (21 years ago, 31-Aug-03, to lugnet.space, FTX)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | Re: SPLASH —Mark Sandlin
| | | | | | | (...) Thanks Mladen. I remember you once saying that a MOC tends to look best when it uses only 3 colors: Base, Secondary, and Highlight. I agree with you about that, so I try to apply that process when possible. :) (...) Heh. Well, it's a craft (...) (21 years ago, 31-Aug-03, to lugnet.space, FTX)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | Re: SPLASH —Travis Kunce
| | | | | | hey, its nice ot see you getting into new styles, but I think this moc is well... not so good. It looks very aircraft like, which I personally try to avoid with .space suff. Also the fore section is so huge, couldn't you have made it more sleek? And (...) (21 years ago, 31-Aug-03, to lugnet.space)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | Re: SPLASH —Mark Sandlin
| | | | | | | (...) I was going for a PCS-meets-SR-71 spyplane, which explains the aircraft look. I'm pretty happy with the way it turned out. Sorry you don't like it. -Grand Admiral and Keeper of Fleebnorks (URL) (21 years ago, 31-Aug-03, to lugnet.space, FTX)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Re: SPLASH —Larry Pieniazek
| | | | | | | (...) Soon as Nik saw it, he said "hey... PCS!" so I think you nailed it. (...) You should be! It's nifty. PS, I agree with you and Mladen about use of primary/secondary/accent colors (three colors). That principle holds with buildings as well as (...) (21 years ago, 31-Aug-03, to lugnet.space, FTX)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | Re: SPLASH —Paul Baulch
| | | | | | (...) Mmmm... shapes-juxtaposed... seksi.... I was trying to think of a good way to describe a particularly appealing design philosophy that this ship uses. I hurriedly coined a term shapes-juxtaposed, as in the craft's form is composed of separate (...) (21 years ago, 1-Sep-03, to lugnet.space, FTX)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | Re: SPLASH —Mark Sandlin
| | | | | | | (...) Heh. Thanks Paul. Maybe you could use some art critic words like "negative space." ;) -Grand Admiral and Keeper of Fleebnorks (URL) (21 years ago, 1-Sep-03, to lugnet.space, FTX)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | Re: SPLASH —Chris Maddison
| | | | | | (...) Oooh, look at that. Very oldskool with a clean and sharp cut to it. The dark blue is the perfect color choice for this, too. And nice pilot - never go wrong with the blast armor torsos. :-) (URL) (21 years ago, 1-Sep-03, to lugnet.space, FTX)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | Re: SPLASH —Patrick Bunn
| | | | | | | (...) I don't know. With a name like SPLASH I expected Daryl Hannah to be flying it. Awesome shape and style though. I'm glad to see PCS being moved in new directions at supersonic speeds. I saw in another post that you were going for an SR-71/PCS (...) (21 years ago, 2-Sep-03, to lugnet.space, FTX)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | Re: SPLASH —Gil Shaw
| | | | | (...) Very Macross man....delicious. The engine cluster is a beaut. Once criticism? The underside. Most of your stuff seems to have bottom side that is as smooth and detailed as the top. This one is a little more exposed. I imagine it would be (...) (21 years ago, 4-Sep-03, to lugnet.space, FTX)
| | | | | | |
