Subject:
|
Re: Capital Ship II
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.space
|
Date:
|
Fri, 16 May 2003 14:22:33 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1071 times
|
| |
|
|
Thanks and get your ship photographed! :-)
In lugnet.space, Jordan D. Greer writes:
> Hey I like it. If you want my personal opinion, big boxes rule! :) In fact,
> I have a 30 pound monstrosity that I have yet to photograph, due to the
> complexity of getting it in and out of my room.
> Here are my tips on cheaply reducing the boxiness of a big-box-type ship (if
> one's Lego hobby were well-funded, one likely wouldn't be building a big-box
> ship in the first place :) ). Add a large superstructure and many antennae,
> also, overhanging pieces of hull work well. I've found that an overhanging
> superstructure is very cheap to build, and very effective at reducing the
> boxiness of a vessel. Think of an H shape on its side.
> The manner in which you engineered the basic structure of the vessel is
> superb. In my huge ships, I often use that honeycomb structure combined with
> baseplates, albeit much more poorly, due to my lack of 2*x pieces.
> I'm sure I'll thoroughly enjoy the completed vessel. Keep building, and good
> luck.
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Capital Ship II
|
| Hey I like it. If you want my personal opinion, big boxes rule! :) In fact, I have a 30 pound monstrosity that I have yet to photograph, due to the complexity of getting it in and out of my room. Here are my tips on cheaply reducing the boxiness of (...) (22 years ago, 16-May-03, to lugnet.space)
|
8 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
