Subject:
|
Re: Ice Planet 2002!!! Err, I mean 1993!!!
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.space
|
Date:
|
Mon, 12 May 2003 20:13:10 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
724 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.space, Matt Canales writes:
> In lugnet.space, Sean Devolites writes:
> > Probably because they thought that by 2002 we be in space age...
> If that's true, they are bad estimators...
Indeed. Kind of like the show Space 1999. Oh, that is probably before your
time. ;)
<old man voice> Back in my day, we all fig'ered you whipersnappers would be
in flying cars and eating vitamin pills that would serve as your entire
daily nutrition by the year 2000. <End old man voice.>
Uh, let's see, there was also Orwell's 1984 that made the same mistake of
dating itself in this way. And I couldn't could the number of near future
movies that made the mistake of giving a year (which has since gone by).
> > Needless to say that aint true : )
> haha :)
It could be true, if we are actually living in the Matrix.
> > Hasta la Vista, Sean
> Me no habla Espanol (Well I do some, but not much... VIVA CHILE!!!)
> Matt C. (If you haven't already noticed my last name means channels in Espanol)
Ich weis es nicht.
-H.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Ice Planet 2002!!! Err, I mean 1993!!!
|
| (...) If that's true, they are bad estimators... (...) haha :) (...) Me no habla Espanol (Well I do some, but not much... VIVA CHILE!!!) Matt C. (If you haven't already noticed my last name means channels in Espanol) (22 years ago, 12-May-03, to lugnet.space)
|
9 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
