 | | Digital Camera
|
| Hi Everyone, I am posting to these various topics because I have seen many examples of digital photos and I wanted to know what kinds of digital cameras you all use and/or recommend. I am interested in buying a camera sometime in the near future, so (...) (25 years ago, 22-May-00, to lugnet.space, lugnet.starwars, lugnet.build.mecha, lugnet.castle)
| | | | | Re: Digital Camera
|
| Hi I use an Agfa ePhoto 1280, which is a bit dated now and has been discontinued, so it has been heavily reduced in price, so if you want one you should be able to find it within your price range at discount stores. It has many 'professional' (...) (25 years ago, 22-May-00, to lugnet.space, lugnet.starwars, lugnet.build.mecha, lugnet.castle)
| | | | | Re: Digital Camera
|
| My goodness, that is very nice quality. I thought it amusing that you can see the tip of Darth's lightsaber blurring as if someone bumped the table. Thanks, ~Mark (...) zoom (...) plan (...) good (...) obviously (...) (25 years ago, 22-May-00, to lugnet.space, lugnet.starwars, lugnet.build.mecha, lugnet.castle)
| | | | | Re: Digital Camera
|
| Hi Mark, You'll probabloy have more luck posting this to lugnet.publish, which is where I set follow-ups to. Cross-posting to many groups can get slightly annoying when the posts are off-topic to the group - nothing personal! People who read (...) (25 years ago, 22-May-00, to lugnet.space, lugnet.starwars, lugnet.build.mecha, lugnet.castle, lugnet.publish)
| | | | | Re: Digital Camera
|
| You may get many specific camera recommendations from users here, but if you don't mind doing some research, here's what I suggest: Go to ActiveBuyersGuide.com: (URL) have a wonderful wizard that will allow you to put in needed features (price (...) (25 years ago, 24-May-00, to lugnet.space, lugnet.starwars, lugnet.build.mecha, lugnet.castle)
| | | | | Re: Digital Camera
|
| Unfortunately, there is no option for "takes good closeups." Many (usually cheaper) digital cameras cannot focus any closer than about 2.5-3 feet. I went through the options and it recommended a whole bunch of bargain-basement cameras, but I'll bet (...) (25 years ago, 24-May-00, to lugnet.space, lugnet.publish)
| | | | | Re: Digital Camera (Go Kodak!)
|
| (...) Can I get in on that bet? My Kodak DC215 (a fairly cheap camera, obtainable now for under $250) has a macro mode that lets you focus as close as 8". The regular focus mode (fixed focus) is no slouch either, working from about half a meter to (...) (25 years ago, 24-May-00, to lugnet.space, lugnet.publish)
| | | | | Re: Digital Camera (Go Kodak!)
|
| (...) Especially see (URL) some of the better close up work I have done with this camera. Will (25 years ago, 24-May-00, to lugnet.space, lugnet.publish)
| | | | | Re: Digital Camera (Go Kodak!)
|
| Aw, heck. I got that decimal in the wrong place again. I'll send you your $.01 soon. ;^) Thanks for the pics. ~Mark (...) them (...) post to (...) $250) has a (...) mode (fixed (...) My (...) soft, (...) no (...) (25 years ago, 24-May-00, to lugnet.space, lugnet.publish)
| | | | | Re: Digital Camera
|
| Mark Sandlin <sandlin@nwlink.com> wrote in message news:Fv32HI.2H1@lugnet.com... (...) Au contrare, all the good cameras have "macro" features (listed in the Buyer's Guide). They tend to be in the more expensive price tier, though ($500 US and up). (...) (25 years ago, 26-May-00, to lugnet.space, lugnet.publish)
| | | | | Re: Digital Camera (Go Kodak!)
|
| (...) I've worked on "softening" the flash a bit by taping a couple of layers of tissue paper over the flash. I suppose a grey filter could work, too, but tissue is nice and cheap, plus it diffuses the flash a bit. Natural daylight seems to be the (...) (25 years ago, 26-May-00, to lugnet.space, lugnet.publish)
| | | | | Re: Digital Camera (Go Kodak!)
|
| Will Middelaer wrote in message ... (...) (fixed (...) My (...) soft, (...) I'll second that, I also have a DC215 (a fancy gold one!) and it has a good macro mode. My complaint about the camera, though, is that its flash is way too harsh, and makes (...) (25 years ago, 27-May-00, to lugnet.space, lugnet.publish)
| | | | | Re: Digital Camera
|
| FUT .publish (...) Well, my Sony Mavica takes pretty good closeup shots. My dad bought it a year and a half ago for ~$250 (I *think*) and I'm sure prices have dropped since then. I dunno what price range you're looking for, but even I (on my $5 an (...) (24 years ago, 28-May-00, to lugnet.space, lugnet.publish)
| | | | | Re: Digital Camera (Go Kodak!)
|
| (...) I really like my Nikon Coolpix 950 for taking pictures of Lego. It's got a great feature for taking good shots in low light without flash or even a tripod. This might not be terribly useful for most purposes, but it's great for little shiny (...) (24 years ago, 30-May-00, to lugnet.space, lugnet.publish)
| | | | | Re: Digital Camera (Go Kodak!)
|
| Heh. I'm sure you do. But at ~$800 I sure won't be considering it. Thanks anyway, ~Mark (...) (24 years ago, 30-May-00, to lugnet.space, lugnet.publish)
| | | | | Re: Digital Camera (Go Kodak!)
|
| (...) Nikon's just come out with a newer slightly fancier model -- I bet there will be a lot of used 950s on the market soon.... (24 years ago, 30-May-00, to lugnet.space, lugnet.publish)
| | | | | Re: Digital Camera (Go Kodak!)
|
| (...) Do you have a page up of examples? (LEGO in low light, bright light, macro zoom-in, etc?) One of the most frustrating things about the Mavica is that its CCD really needs a lot of light to take clear pictures. --Todd (24 years ago, 30-May-00, to lugnet.space, lugnet.publish)
| | | | | Re: Digital Camera (Go Kodak!)
|
| (...) I don't yet; I've got a bunch of pictures (ie thousands; not all of lego) that I need to go through and sort and process and so forth. The pictures on Karen's web page at (URL) aren't the best we've taken, but they're pretty decent. (I think (...) (24 years ago, 30-May-00, to lugnet.space, lugnet.publish)
| |
