Subject:
|
Re: Digital Camera (Go Kodak!)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.space, lugnet.publish
|
Date:
|
Tue, 30 May 2000 02:22:19 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
mattdm@mattdmSPAMLESS.org
|
Viewed:
|
687 times
|
| |
|
|
Paul Baulch <paul@vic.bigpond.net.au> wrote:
> I'll second that, I also have a DC215 (a fancy gold one!) and it has a good
> macro mode. My complaint about the camera, though, is that its flash is way
> too harsh, and makes indoor 1-2m shots come out really poor. In hindsight I
> would have looked for a camera which included a socket for an external
I really like my Nikon Coolpix 950 for taking pictures of Lego. It's got a
great feature for taking good shots in low light without flash or even a
tripod. This might not be terribly useful for most purposes, but it's great
for little shiny plasting things!
--
Matthew Miller ---> mattdm@mattdm.org
Quotes 'R' Us ---> http://quotes-r-us.org/
Boston University Linux ---> http://linux.bu.edu/
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: Digital Camera (Go Kodak!)
|
| (...) Do you have a page up of examples? (LEGO in low light, bright light, macro zoom-in, etc?) One of the most frustrating things about the Mavica is that its CCD really needs a lot of light to take clear pictures. --Todd (24 years ago, 30-May-00, to lugnet.space, lugnet.publish)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Digital Camera (Go Kodak!)
|
| Will Middelaer wrote in message ... (...) (fixed (...) My (...) soft, (...) I'll second that, I also have a DC215 (a fancy gold one!) and it has a good macro mode. My complaint about the camera, though, is that its flash is way too harsh, and makes (...) (24 years ago, 27-May-00, to lugnet.space, lugnet.publish)
|
18 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
