| |
Mark Sandlin <sandlin@nwlink.com> wrote in message
news:Fv32HI.2H1@lugnet.com...
> Unfortunately, there is no option for "takes good closeups."
Au contrare, all the good cameras have "macro" features (listed in the
Buyer's Guide). They tend to be in the more expensive price tier, though
($500 US and up).
> Many (usually cheaper) digital cameras cannot focus any closer than
> about 2.5-3 feet.
>
> I went through the options and it recommended a whole bunch of
> bargain-basement cameras, but I'll bet you $100.00 that none of them
> take good closeup shots... a la the Sony Mavica I used on my last post to
> my website.
>
> Thanks anyway,
>
> ~Mark
>
>
> In lugnet.space, Paul Davidson writes:
> > You may get many specific camera recommendations from users here, • but if you
> > don't mind doing some research, here's what I suggest:
> >
> > Go to ActiveBuyersGuide.com:
> > http://www6.activebuyersguide.com/abg/nav/StartGuide.cfm?CatID=2&P • ID=0X6X1X2
> > 5769X25c20&RefID=0
> >
> > They have a wonderful wizard that will allow you to put in needed • features
> > (price range, macro functions, etc.), and it will end up generating a • list
> > of cameras with complete specs that fall within your needs.
> >
> > Then head over to PCPhotoReview.com, look up the cameras you're • interested
> > in, and see how their contributors rate the cameras. This worked • extremely
> > well for me.
> >
> > --
> >
> >
> > Paul Davidson
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Digital Camera
|
| Unfortunately, there is no option for "takes good closeups." Many (usually cheaper) digital cameras cannot focus any closer than about 2.5-3 feet. I went through the options and it recommended a whole bunch of bargain-basement cameras, but I'll bet (...) (25 years ago, 24-May-00, to lugnet.space, lugnet.publish)
|
18 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
