Subject:
|
Re: Deciding on a large ship acronym
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.space
|
Date:
|
Thu, 31 Oct 2002 14:36:11 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
804 times
|
| |
|
|
Funny...concise...definitive....I like it!
I think it's a good mix of all the suggestions and relatively
self-explanatory enough for common usuage.
My vote is 'yay'.
Now I just have to build one :)
Cheers,
-G
In lugnet.space, Jon Palmer writes:
> Many good ideas were thrown around when we last discussed this. After
> thinking about it for a long while I've decided that SHIP is a cool term.
>
> James Brown, who proposed the term, said it stood for Seriously Huge
> Interstellar Plastic.
> I added that it might be a Seriously Huge Investment in Parts.
> I think both of these are cool and maybe even others could be funny.
>
> (Some How I Phinished ;-)
>
>
> It was also proposed that we develop a Roman numeral system to measure ship
> size.
>
> http://news.lugnet.com/space/?n=16958
> http://news.lugnet.com/space/?n=16998
>
> Why not combine the two? For example from now on anything that is larger
> than 100 studs (aside from it's function) would be a C1 SHIP. 200 up would
> be a C2 SHIP etc..
>
> Anything less than 100 studs would just be a ship.
> Makes sense to me. :-)
>
> What ya think?
>
> -Jon
> --
> | The Shipyard - http://zemi.net/shipyard
> | The Moonbase Project - http://www.classic-space.com/moonbase/start/
> | My Lego Creations - http://zemi.net/lego
> | Attack of the Bricks - http://www.bricklink.com/store.asp?p=jpalmer
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Deciding on a large ship acronym
|
| Many good ideas were thrown around when we last discussed this. After thinking about it for a long while I've decided that SHIP is a cool term. James Brown, who proposed the term, said it stood for Seriously Huge Interstellar Plastic. I added that (...) (22 years ago, 30-Oct-02, to lugnet.space)
|
8 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
