 | | Re: More moonbase and Monorail discussion —Markham Carroll
|
| | | "Mike Petrucelli" <lordi@erols.com> wrote in message news:H1s92p.2y2@lugnet.com... (...) what (...) Actually, I'd say that at least 8, maybe 10 high, and about 8 wide. The whole teminal would need to take up two 48x48 plates, since my 6990 train (...) (22 years ago, 2-Sep-02, to lugnet.space)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: More moonbase and Monorail discussion —Jon Palmer
|
| | | | "Markham Carroll" <mc_booga@hotpop.com> wrote in message news:H1sBwE.881@lugnet.com... (...) I'm not so concerned with building a structure that can contain an entire train. My main goal with this is to have a tunnel properly aligned on my module so (...) (22 years ago, 2-Sep-02, to lugnet.space)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: More moonbase and Monorail discussion —Frank Filz
|
| | | | (...) I'd go with the station at 20 studs unless you are building the nearby modules to contain the ramps down to 10 studs. Please make your station/tunnel capable of accepting a 6 wide train (which probably means an 8-wide tunnel). (...) I agree, (...) (22 years ago, 3-Sep-02, to lugnet.space)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: More moonbase and Monorail discussion —Jon Palmer
|
| | | | "Frank Filz" <ffilz@mindspring.com> wrote in message news:3D752267.2C60DC...ing.com... (...) The (...) train (...) Good stuff. I had already decided on 20 studs up before you posted this. It's also 8 wide. Now I need to make sure it's tall enough. (...) (22 years ago, 3-Sep-02, to lugnet.space)
|
| | | | |
