To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.spaceOpen lugnet.space in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Space / 1632
1631  |  1633
Subject: 
Re: Cryo chamber (was: Re: Victorian Home Redux (was: Re: Sidebar stuff))
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.space
Date: 
Sat, 18 Mar 2000 22:22:17 GMT
Viewed: 
1248 times
  
In lugnet.space, Lindsay Frederick Braun writes:
I almost died laughing when I saw the skeleton.  Is it a standard
feature of any SF movie that uses cryosleep that one chamber *must*
fail?  :)

But of course! You can't do without it! :-)

When I think of it, you're right... the movies I can think of that used
cyrosleep all had one that failed... (Planet Ape (1) had the female die right
off the bat, Lost in Space had the big sister (name=?) get stuck... prolly
others I can't think of right now :)

-Shiri

(1) Not sure if that's the name, I saw it in hebrew... :-)



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Cryo chamber (was: Re: Victorian Home Redux (was: Re: Sidebar stuff))
 
Shiri Dori <shirid@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:Frn255.J63@lugnet.com... (...) right (...) More recently, Supernova (it sucked, don't bother seeing it) had a gruesome malfunction (though they technically weren't cryo units, but some sort of (...) (25 years ago, 20-Mar-00, to lugnet.space)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Cryo chamber (was: Re: Victorian Home Redux (was: Re: Sidebar stuff))
 
(...) I almost died laughing when I saw the skeleton. Is it a standard feature of any SF movie that uses cryosleep that one chamber *must* fail? :) best Lindsay (25 years ago, 18-Mar-00, to lugnet.space)

26 Messages in This Thread:







Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR