 | | Re: 32x32 moonbase modules —David Carriker
| | | | "William R Ward" <bill@wards.net> wrote in message news:m2ado5uky2.fsf@...rds.net... (...) How about using a 32 by 32 baseplate padded with 16x16 or 32x16 base plates on two sides. (or even 8x16) There might be "gaps" in the base of the overall (...) (22 years ago, 2-Aug-02, to lugnet.space)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: 32x32 moonbase modules —William R. Ward
| | | | | (...) Sure, if you don't mind green :-) (...) My point is that any 32x32 modules would only be allowable on the periphery of the moonbase, since they could not be connected on two of the sides. However, if they're built properly they can still (...) (22 years ago, 5-Aug-02, to lugnet.space)
| | | | | | |
