 | | Re: New space building standard and submission to www.classic-space.com
|
|
(...) Whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, Ami Mizuno! What do you mean by all of this on that page? I mean, granted, I have a 122 I.Q. but anything beyond pre-algebra I have a hard time understanding. They do look nice but my theory is to simply (...) (22 years ago, 29-Jul-02, to lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: New space building standard and submission to www.classic-space.com
|
|
(...) all of (...) I kind of agree here. This reminds me of music theory: while it's all true and makes sense if you study it long enough, does John Williams really think "I should change keys 12 bars into the second phrase using a regressive (...) (22 years ago, 29-Jul-02, to lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: New space building standard and submission to www.classic-space.com
|
|
(...) true (...) think (...) I agree that sometimes theory can go interfere with visceral enjoyment. However, as an aspiring music theorist, I'd like to extend your analogy: John Williams probably DOES think about cadences and key transitions. His (...) (22 years ago, 29-Jul-02, to lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: New space building standard and submission to www.classic-space.com
|
|
"Luke Ma" <Luke_Ma@brown.edu> wrote in message news:H015wJ.4FK@lugnet.com... <snip> (...) Haha, ya got me. I'm really an engineer - I just hang around a lot of music majors, so I was dropping some of those big words I hear them say. Napoleon, (...) (22 years ago, 30-Jul-02, to lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: New space building standard and submission to www.classic-space.com
|
|
(...) Hey, it's all stripey ice cream to me... Steve (22 years ago, 30-Jul-02, to lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: New space building standard and submission to www.classic-space.com
|
|
(...) Hi Jesse, I agree with you. Simple ideas should have simple presentation. It also came to my mind that the real or perceived complexity of my building system may be a poor mist for charlatanism. I am not naive: where there is seduction there (...) (22 years ago, 30-Jul-02, to lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: New space building standard and submission to www.classic-space.com
|
|
(...) Hi Tom, Of course my concept describes the shape so there is some parallel with music theory and other grammars. It is a construction of its own. So one motivation is just the beauty of it. A second motivation is that photos and building (...) (22 years ago, 30-Jul-02, to lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: New space building standard and submission to www.classic-space.com
|
|
(...) <snip> (...) Thanks, this has at least helped me to understand what you're getting at. But it seems to me that this system doesn't account for building techniques that work at multiple angles. For example, using bricks with studs on the side (...) (22 years ago, 31-Jul-02, to lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: New space building standard and submission to www.classic-space.com
|
|
(...) Hi Lucas, Studs on side are taken into account in basic cases such as headligths (as "light") and cone engines (as "egret"). Remember the building system is designed for classic space theme (early 1980s). There was no bricks with studs on the (...) (22 years ago, 31-Jul-02, to lugnet.space)
|
