Subject:
|
Re: A tanker
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.space
|
Date:
|
Mon, 11 Feb 2002 08:24:25 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
358 times
|
| |
| |
In lugnet.space, Trevor Pruden writes:
> A couple pics of this sub capital was taken for my by fellow group member
> Ken Koleda (thanks, Ken!) at the Michlug mini-meet yesterday. It's about
> 107 studs long when the tanker module is attached by means of a collar.
>
> http://www.brickshelf.com/gallery/tpruden/Astrolift-IT420/tanker1.jpg
>
> More pics of this ship and two more on the way.
Two more what? Two more ships? :D Or can the modules be run in
tandem, like the tandem load lorries that are still legal in Ohio
and Michigan?
The collar: What's the theory there? Just Technic pegs? Or is
it good for bearing the connector's load?
I have to agree, also, that the thrusters are the real highlight
of the command module--I can picture it trying to scoot its way
around to dock with the tank. How many points of articulation are
there on each? (I see at least two per arm.)
Anyways, nice work. I really have a soft spot for utility craft--
sort of like "Builder Bob in Space."
best
LFB
|
|
Message has 1 Reply: | | Re: A tanker
|
| (...) Thanks, Lindsay! Well, at the moment there are 2 points of articulation with the engines plus each vane has one pont of articulation. It would have been relatively easy to allow the engines to swing around and point forward but I was concerned (...) (23 years ago, 11-Feb-02, to lugnet.space)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | A tanker
|
| A couple pics of this sub capital was taken for my by fellow group member Ken Koleda (thanks, Ken!) at the Michlug mini-meet yesterday. It's about 107 studs long when the tanker module is attached by means of a collar. (URL) pics of this ship and (...) (23 years ago, 11-Feb-02, to lugnet.space)
|
10 Messages in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|