Subject:
|
Re: Galaxy Explorer (Was Re: Poor packaging by TLC )
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general, lugnet.space
|
Date:
|
Tue, 8 Feb 2000 19:32:07 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
86 times
|
| |
![Post a public reply to this message](/news/icon-reply.gif) | |
In lugnet.general, Scott E. Sanburn wrote:
> Jeffrey,
>
> Jeffrey Baldwin wrote:
>
> > How do you feel about the 928? I think it is kinda plain.
I'm with Jeffrey. I think a lot of people get very nostalgic for Classic Space,
and rate it higher because of their history with the line.
Personally, I get nostalgic for the Explorien Starship, because it was the first
big set I bought completely for myself, without pretending I was just buying it
for the kids. Now, a lot of people don't care for this set, because of numerous
deficencies, but I think it is awesome. :)
Every LEGO set needs somebody to love it. (did I just write that? Blech!)
> (Oh No! Scott is getting on his Space Soapbox!)
>
> I can appreciate sentiments of this type. However, since Space is
> probably my favorite theme, and have been collecting it since I was 4,
> and I have most of the sets since 1984. I think this line (497, 487, and
> 918) are still really neat, even without the special parts we have
> today. The reason? Realism! These sets look like something feasible, not
> some neon nightrider nightmare from Batman Forever or something. I can
> see mankind actually going into space with these sets. One of my most
> prized sets is the 487:
>
> http://www.lugnet.com/pause/search/?query=487-1
Realistic? Take another look at that set. The engines are mounted on the cargo
doors! How realistic is that? ;)
Steve
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
52 Messages in This Thread: ![Has any one else noticed this lately? -Eric Brouwer (6-Jan-00 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Has any one else noticed this lately? -Larry Pieniazek (6-Jan-00 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Has any one else noticed this lately? -Tamyra Teed (7-Jan-00 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Poor packaging by TLC (was: Has any one else noticed...) -Kevin Salm (7-Jan-00 to lugnet.general, lugnet.dear-lego)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Poor packaging by TLC (was: Has any one else noticed...) -Jason M. Normand (7-Jan-00 to lugnet.general, lugnet.dear-lego)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: Poor packaging by TLC (was: Has any one else noticed...) -Steve Wooster (7-Jan-00 to lugnet.general, lugnet.dear-lego)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Poor packaging by TLC (was: Has any one else noticed...) -Rob Hendrix (7-Jan-00 to lugnet.general, lugnet.dear-lego)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: Poor packaging by TLC (was: Has any one else noticed...) -Christian Gemuenden (9-Jan-00 to lugnet.general, lugnet.dear-lego)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Poor packaging by TLC (was: Has any one else noticed...) -Kevin Salm (12-Jan-00 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Poor packaging by TLC (was: Has any one else noticed...) -James Simpson (1-Feb-00 to lugnet.general, lugnet.dear-lego)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Poor packaging by TLC (was: Has any one else noticed...) -Mike Poindexter (2-Feb-00 to lugnet.general, lugnet.dear-lego)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Poor packaging by TLC (was: Has any one else noticed...) -Gary R. Istok (2-Feb-00 to lugnet.general, lugnet.dear-lego)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Poor packaging by TLC (was: Has any one else noticed...) -Tony Priestman (2-Feb-00 to lugnet.general, lugnet.dear-lego)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Poor packaging by TLC (was: Has any one else noticed...) -John Robert Blaze Kanehl (3-Feb-00 to lugnet.general, lugnet.dear-lego)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Poor packaging by TLC (was: Has any one else noticed...) -Paul Baulch (6-Feb-00 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Poor packaging by TLC (was: Has any one else noticed...) -Tony Priestman (5-Feb-00 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Galaxy Explorer (Was Re: Poor packaging by TLC ) -Paul Baulch (7-Feb-00 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Galaxy Explorer (Was Re: Poor packaging by TLC ) -Tony Priestman (6-Feb-00 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: Galaxy Explorer (Was Re: Poor packaging by TLC ) -Larry Pieniazek (6-Feb-00 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Galaxy Explorer (Was Re: Poor packaging by TLC ) -Tony Priestman (6-Feb-00 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Nothing new (was Re: Galaxy Explorer (Was Re: Poor packaging by TLC )) -Richard Parsons (7-Feb-00 to lugnet.pirates)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Galaxy Explorer (Was Re: Poor packaging by TLC ) -Steve Bliss (7-Feb-00 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Galaxy Explorer (Was Re: Poor packaging by TLC ) -Paul Mison (7-Feb-00 to lugnet.general, lugnet.space)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Galaxy Explorer (Was Re: Poor packaging by TLC ) -Damian Garcia (8-Feb-00 to lugnet.general, lugnet.space)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Galaxy Explorer (Was Re: Poor packaging by TLC ) -Jeffrey Baldwin (8-Feb-00 to lugnet.general, lugnet.space)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Galaxy Explorer (Was Re: Poor packaging by TLC ) -Gene C. Weissinger (8-Feb-00 to lugnet.general, lugnet.space)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: Galaxy Explorer (Was Re: Poor packaging by TLC ) -Scott Edward Sanburn (8-Feb-00 to lugnet.general, lugnet.space)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Galaxy Explorer (Was Re: Poor packaging by TLC ) -Mark Sandlin (8-Feb-00 to lugnet.general, lugnet.space)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Galaxy Explorer (Was Re: Poor packaging by TLC ) -Scott Edward Sanburn (8-Feb-00 to lugnet.general, lugnet.space)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![You are here](/news/here.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Galaxy Explorer (Was Re: Poor packaging by TLC ) -John J. Ladasky, Jr. (9-Feb-00 to lugnet.general, lugnet.space)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Galaxy Explorer (Was Re: Poor packaging by TLC ) -Damian Garcia (9-Feb-00 to lugnet.general, lugnet.space)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Galaxy Explorer (Was Re: Poor packaging by TLC ) -Steve Bliss (10-Feb-00 to lugnet.space)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Galaxy Explorer (Was Re: Poor packaging by TLC ) -Duane Hess (10-Feb-00 to lugnet.space)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Galaxy Explorer (Was Re: Poor packaging by TLC ) -Steve Bliss (10-Feb-00 to lugnet.space)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Galaxy Explorer (Was Re: Poor packaging by TLC ) -Mark Sandlin (11-Feb-00 to lugnet.space)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Galaxy Explorer (Was Re: Poor packaging by TLC ) -John J. Ladasky, Jr. (11-Feb-00 to lugnet.space)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Galaxy Explorer (Was Re: Poor packaging by TLC ) -Paul Baulch (9-Feb-00 to lugnet.general, lugnet.space)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Poor packaging by TLC (was: Has any one else noticed...) -James Simpson (7-Feb-00 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Poor packaging by TLC (was: Has any one else noticed...) -Alan Gerber (7-Feb-00 to lugnet.general, lugnet.dear-lego)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: Poor packaging by TLC (was: Has any one else noticed...) -John Robert Blaze Kanehl (3-Feb-00 to lugnet.general, lugnet.dear-lego)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Poor packaging by TLC (was: Has any one else noticed...) -John Robert Blaze Kanehl (3-Feb-00 to lugnet.general, lugnet.dear-lego)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Poor packaging by TLC (was: Has any one else noticed...) -John DiRienzo (3-Feb-00 to lugnet.general, lugnet.dear-lego)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Poor packaging by TLC (was: Has any one else noticed...) -Christopher Tracey (3-Feb-00 to lugnet.general, lugnet.dear-lego)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Poor packaging by TLC (was: Has any one else noticed...) -Jeff Stembel (4-Feb-00 to lugnet.general, lugnet.dear-lego)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Poor packaging by TLC (was: Has any one else noticed...) -Frank Filz (4-Feb-00 to lugnet.general, lugnet.dear-lego)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Has any one else noticed this lately? -Steve Campbell (7-Jan-00 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Has any one else noticed this lately? -Larry Pieniazek (7-Jan-00 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Has any one else noticed this lately? -James Brown (7-Jan-00 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Has any one else noticed this lately? -Frank Filz (7-Jan-00 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: Has any one else noticed this lately? -Matthew Miller (7-Jan-00 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Has any one else noticed this lately? -Tony Kilaras (8-Jan-00 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|