Subject:
|
Re: Has any one else noticed this lately?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Fri, 7 Jan 2000 21:24:54 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2739 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.general, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> Agreed, CA is swell. But my question to you is, you asked for a discount
> and got it. Was that just to cover the hassle of getting the replacement
> parts? Or did you argue that because there were parts missing, you
> should get a discount for the value OF THOSE PARTS.
>
> I ask not to be judgemental, but merely because I am curious.
>
> I today bought 2 4561s which had been opened, at a particular Target. I
> dealt with a supervisor, identified what parts were missing, and made a
> case that I should get an additional discount, based on the value of the
> missing parts. I got it. Therefore, I personally now would not feel
> justified in going to CA to ask for the replacement, as to me,
> personally, that smacks of double dipping. TARGET should take the hit,
> it's THEIR security that allowed the shrinkage. Doesn't seem fair to ask
> LEGO to eat it.
>
> Am I alone in this rather radical stance?
Nope.(1) However, I would consider it fair to go to CA, and offer to pay them
for the missing parts. (assuming I thought the missing parts were worth it -
otherwise, I'd just drop it).
James
http://www.shades-of-night.com/lego/
1:But then, I'm the kind of freak that corrects a teller's math when I get too
much change, too.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Has any one else noticed this lately?
|
| James Brown wrote in message ... (...) them (...) it - (...) I'd agree with both of you. To be honest, I haven't even gone back to CA for pieces missing or damaged from used sets. The only thing I've gone to them for was stickers from a couple (...) (27 years ago, 7-Jan-00, to lugnet.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Has any one else noticed this lately?
|
| (...) Agreed, CA is swell. But my question to you is, you asked for a discount and got it. Was that just to cover the hassle of getting the replacement parts? Or did you argue that because there were parts missing, you should get a discount for the (...) (27 years ago, 7-Jan-00, to lugnet.general)
|
52 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
