To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.generalOpen lugnet.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 General / 14387
14386  |  14388
Subject: 
Re: Poor packaging by TLC (was: Has any one else noticed...)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.general, lugnet.dear-lego
Date: 
Tue, 1 Feb 2000 23:01:31 GMT
Viewed: 
2127 times
  
In lugnet.general, Kevin Salm writes:
The issue of poor packaging for retail Lego sets has bothered me for some time.

I remember the days gone by ('cause I still have all the boxes) when TLC
packaged the larger sets in styrofoam-lined boxes with plasic insert trays.
These were the good old days of Lego boxes--boxes that would last a long time
when used to store the pieces.  I haven't seen a styrofoam-lined box by Lego
since about 1980.  Since then the strutural quality and integrity of Lego set
boxes has declined.

When my copy of 4554 Metrostation arrived from S@H, it was in a full-sized
flip-top box with divider in the inner box.  Not too bad.  A few years later
when I ordered 2150 Retrostation I was very dissappointed that the box of
identical dimensions was not a flip-top box but just the thin paperboard TLC
used for its outer packaging.  As well, among the larger Star Wars sets, none
have the flip-top box feature.  Today sets are packed with only the thin
paperboard as protection from all sorts of mishandling, etc.

Then sets like 3052 and 3053 appeared on the shelves with a much stronger
paperboard that was 100 sealed, not just held closed by two little adhesive
stickers on the ends.  Well, I was happy with this and figured that all
retailers would be, too.  Unfortunately, this packaging does not seem to be a
standard for TLC.

Buyers of Lego and the retail outlets who sell Lego all have to deal with
opened packages since Lego boxes are not sealed well.  The seals provided are
much too easy for ill-intentioned childeren and adults to breach.  Some of this
activity occurs in stores and after purchasing with the intent of returning
sets that have been pilfered to some degree.

Poor package design is at fault here (as well as unscrupulous consumers) and
could easily be improved without substantial packaging costs [speculation].  I
favor packaging similar to that used on Lego Ninja Sets 3052 and 3053, 6088,
etc.  Something should be done since opened/damaged sets in stores are subject
to full wholesale credit for retailers which, of course, costs TLC money.

TLC, as an enterprising venture, should see this as avoidable and unacceptable
expense; a problem with a viable solution easily at hand.  I hope that they do
see things this way and act accordingly--the sooner the better.














In lugnet.general, Tamyra Teed writes:
I've noticed this too.. more because I got a box without looking that
someone apparently had opened, taken out what they wanted, and the GLUED
it shut again and returned it. I'm not sure if they'll believe me if I
take it back though... so I pondered calling CA though should they
really pay for someone elses greed and rudeness?? I don't think so..
though you can be sure I'll be looking at my boxes much more closely
from now on.

I just can't believe people have the b*lls to do this kind of stuff..
what's worse is they get away with it :(

Tamy


leggomylego wrote:

I hit the jackpot at a local Target today.  (I tell you what I got a little
later!)  One thing I did notice were a LOT of sets that were bought, VERY
carefully opened, looted, and returned.  I noticed it on 2 different Amazon
Ruins.  The tape on the bottom edge of the taped down tray just wasn't
sticking like it usually does.  Then looking at it longer, I noticed someone
swiped the base plate!!!  I was quite upset.  I could have used a few of • those
sets at $19.  But w/o the plate, I couldn't do it.  Several other boxes were
opened as well.  The ones that are taped on the sides; when you pull the • tape
up, it gets a little cloudy.  Someone had used another adhesive to get the
tape to stick back down.  Some of the boxes that actually tear, you could • see
where the box was sliced, and retaped.  I have noticed this more and more
lately.  Any one else?

Eric

An important part of my Pre-Dark Ages Lego experience was enjoying the box.  I
remember fondly those substantial boxes from the 70's with the deep trays and
wonderful Alternate designs on the back and inside lid.  I loved the way classic
space was packaged - the 2 or 3 crater holes packed with pieces.  Things were
still good even until the early 90's.  The Whirl N' Wheel Super Truck, my long-
lost beloved, had the flip lid and nice plastic "window" to see the pieces
(though the cardboard box was a bit flimsy.)  When I emerged from my dark-ages
in March of 99, and purchased the Tie-Fighter/Y-Wing over the Internet, I
naively expected the box to be part of the experience again.  (I know, it was my
bad...I didn't pay attention to Lego boxes on the shelves.  I was in my Dark
Ages.)  I cannot stress how gravely disappointed I was when I saw/opened the
box.  I felt cheated; it was like they just stuck the pieces in there and said
"Here your Legos, kid.  That'll be fifty-four dollars (accompanied by hearty,
condescending, Boy-We-Put-One-Over-On-You laugher.)  For all of us who grew up
on Lego, I'd wager that the wonderful boxes were an important part of the whole
experience.  A wish come true would be if Lego would bring back the flip-top and
clear window for the large SW sets.



Message has 2 Replies:
  Re: Poor packaging by TLC (was: Has any one else noticed...)
 
James Simpson <jsimpson@rice.edu> wrote in message news:Fp9xAJ.J47@lugnet.com... [snip] (...) box. I (...) and (...) classic (...) were (...) long- (...) dark-ages (...) was my (...) Dark (...) the (...) said (...) hearty, (...) grew up (...) whole (...) (25 years ago, 2-Feb-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.dear-lego)
  Re: Poor packaging by TLC (was: Has any one else noticed...)
 
On Tue, 1 Feb 2000, James Simpson (<Fp9xAJ.J47@lugnet.com>) wrote at 23:01:31 (...) Too true. I really have to steel myself to open some of the old stuff that I've got. But I bought it to build it, as well as enjoying the packaging :-) Last year, I (...) (25 years ago, 2-Feb-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.dear-lego)

Message is in Reply To:
  Poor packaging by TLC (was: Has any one else noticed...)
 
The issue of poor packaging for retail Lego sets has bothered me for some time. I remember the days gone by ('cause I still have all the boxes) when TLC packaged the larger sets in styrofoam-lined boxes with plasic insert trays. These were the good (...) (25 years ago, 7-Jan-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.dear-lego)

52 Messages in This Thread:























Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR