To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.spaceOpen lugnet.space in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Space / *9412 (-10)
  Re: The Chase!
 
(...) Cool! (...) I did but after I posted them I realized that the Lgeo renders had a few minor problems and so when I moved the scene to brickshelf I didn't post those. I'm going out of town for about a week now, (I'll still have access to Lugnet (...) (24 years ago, 21-Jun-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.build, lugnet.cad.ray)
 
  Re: sorry, just call me baku.
 
Ahhh! I feel better now. I almost didn't ask because I thought maybe you didn't want people to remember, but oh well, curiosity got me. Good luck with the comic, it sounds like fun:) Is there a site with all the info still on it? Send me all the (...) (24 years ago, 21-Jun-01, to lugnet.space)
 
  Re: Wings [was: Re: Building big]
 
Hi. Gravity generators per se are not in violation of the laws of physics. However, they are far in advance of any current technology that we have. In order to generate an artificial gravity field, without the use of centrifugal force, we'd have to (...) (24 years ago, 21-Jun-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.loc.au)
 
  Re: The Chase!
 
(...) Done! :-, I'll post an update soon. BTW, in the original message you mention some renderings of the same scene using LGEO parts...do you still have those? Cheers, - jsproat (24 years ago, 21-Jun-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.build, lugnet.cad.ray)
 
  Re: On to other news....
 
My 889, 891, 894, 897, 918 and 920 all show (C)1979 on the instructions. I'm afraid the boxes never made it... However, 367 is (C)1975.... ;-) Duq "Suzanne D. Rich" <suz@baseplate.com> wrote in message news:3B3252A5.A405CE...ate.com... (...) started (...) (24 years ago, 21-Jun-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.general)
 
  Re: Wings [was: Re: Building big]
 
(...) Thank you, Bill, for telling me what the name of that technology was in my letter. There is a fatal flaw in your response, however, Bill. You seem to think that it is impossible to conduct this type of technology yet you already answered how (...) (24 years ago, 21-Jun-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.loc.au)
 
  sorry, just call me baku.
 
(...) Hi, I was really excited about it too, but I am also working on another project that has sort of taken over my free time, I have been working on creating a graphic novel for a few years, and I just finished writing the storyline last month. (...) (24 years ago, 21-Jun-01, to lugnet.space)
 
  Re: On to other news....
 
(...) I appreciate that you have shown the box for the proof of their arguement, Suzanne. Jesse Long (24 years ago, 21-Jun-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.general)
 
  Re: On to other news....
 
(...) For the sake of further evidence, I own a classic space LEGO box that says '1978'. it was purchased in the USA (for me as a kid). Differentiating characteristic between 493 in 1978 is the lack of a crater baseplate (uses bricks to build (...) (24 years ago, 21-Jun-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.general)
 
  Re: The Chase!
 
Hey that'd be cool by me! : ) -Jon "Ryan Farrington" <ryanjf@ifriendly.com> wrote in message news:004f01c0fa75$5d...dly.com... (...) (24 years ago, 21-Jun-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.build, lugnet.cad.ray)


Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more

Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR