|
|
 | | Re: Light attack carrier
|
| (...) Thanks, I was pretty happy with the submarine-y look the wheels gave to the doors. It'd be nice to do the same thing to the torpedo-tube doors, perhaps if the tubes were 4x4 this could be done well. (...) Yeah, I was sort of hazy on this. I (...) (22 years ago, 1-Jul-03, to lugnet.space, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Light attack carrier
|
| (...) It's a very impressive (and innovative) ship, carrying an entirely satisfactory number of fighters (though I can't imagine life would be much fun for the fighter pilots!). To my eye, the new design isn't as good as the old one. The new nose (...) (22 years ago, 1-Jul-03, to lugnet.space, FTX)
| | | | | Re: It Looked Good on Paper...
|
| (...) cool thought proccess about the how-it-works of the Flea Jeff (22 years ago, 1-Jul-03, to lugnet.space, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Redesign of my microship...
|
| (...) mmm...ok...for what reason did you name her 'Hope' hee (if private, don't answer, i was just being VERY literal, not using 'why') (...) did she burst into tears when you said that? ;) i think it looks great just the way it is (really) (...) (...) (22 years ago, 1-Jul-03, to lugnet.space, lugnet.build, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Light attack carrier
|
| (...) At last!!! And even more incredible than before! The bow design, the torpedo tubes, the greeblies, the fighters, the engines, the gear...absolutely incredible. Just incredible. Absolutely, positively, incredible. Perfectly done. (22 years ago, 30-Jun-03, to lugnet.space, FTX)
|
|
