|
|
 | | Re: The Flame and The Lance
|
| (...) I promise never to do it again ;-) (...) Well, the trouble with the bottom is I never see it when it's sitting on the shelf, and bits on the bottom make it harder to place there, and it's too hard to photograph the bottom anyway :-) Cheers, (...) (22 years ago, 18-Jun-03, to lugnet.space, FTX)
| | | | | Re: The Flame and The Lance
|
| (...) The hangar bays were the main reason I even bothered building such a big microscale ship, really. It's a lot longer than the RBR, and heavier, despite containing a lot less wagon wheels... ;-) Cheers, (URL) Sci-Fi LEGO> (22 years ago, 18-Jun-03, to lugnet.space, FTX)
| | | | | Re: The Flame and The Lance
|
| (...) Glad you asked :-) Primarily Ken Takeuchi's (URL) and (URL) Sparta>. No surprise there. White and light-gray suggest large scale to me. But I wanted to take the concept in a sleeker direction, but for a while I wasn't sure how. So along comes (...) (22 years ago, 18-Jun-03, to lugnet.space, FTX)
| | | | | Re: The Flame and The Lance
|
| (...) Yeah, I was pleased with the hangars, actually they were the main reason I made such big microscale ships - I wanted to make conceptually decent-sized hangar bays. (...) The pleasure is mine... I just wish I had a better camera. Cheers, (URL) (...) (22 years ago, 18-Jun-03, to lugnet.space, FTX)
| | | | | Re: The Flame and The Lance
|
| (...) Actually, that hadn't sprung to my mind... but I guess the overall form of the Lance does suggest the same sleekness. I love Star Wars (and have most of the spaceship toys), but I don't consciously look to it for inspiration. Cheers, (URL) (...) (22 years ago, 18-Jun-03, to lugnet.space, FTX)
|
|
