 | | Re: Repost of the G.A.C and the C.A.C
|
|
(...) I suppose I will have to be the "heavy" here and just speak up. 1) Don't "bump" your own posts. 2) Please trim quoted sig pics and irrelevant stuff off the top of replies. 3) There are two general reasons why your creation may not get (...) (21 years ago, 9-Jun-03, to lugnet.space, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: About FTX pictures and Sig images.
|
|
(...) snip... (good sized sig pic BTW) Most of the time it's not the size, but how you use it. :-) While I have plenty of bandwidth at work, I'm still on a dial-up at home. I'm all for snipping out other people's sig when replying. One, it saves on (...) (21 years ago, 9-Jun-03, to lugnet.space, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: About FTX pictures and Sig images.
|
|
(...) Less is more. Giddens at first had a billboard attached to the end of his posts, but he soon reduced it to a nice little pic of his sig fig and a planetscape, which I think turned out well. -Grand Admiral (URL) (21 years ago, 9-Jun-03, to lugnet.space, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: About FTX pictures and Sig images.
|
|
(...) To Gil, Mark, and Nathan; I think the sig pics you guys just used are good. I hope people use your sig pics as a guide for the largest some one should make a banner style sig pic. As far as the icon style sig pics, I think the Grand Admiral (...) (21 years ago, 9-Jun-03, to lugnet.space, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Repost of the G.A.C and the C.A.C
|
|
(...) I hope that there are some deflectors of some sort to protect the pilot. An exposed person at 270 MPH might not be the most pleasant position to be in... (...) snipped sig pic... (...) Generally, if you want feedback, wait a while. If you (...) (21 years ago, 9-Jun-03, to lugnet.space, FTX)
|
