 | | Re: New Fad?
|
|
(...) Perhaps the requirement be that the ship is "functional" so to speak: i.e., there is crew access, and it won't tip to one side or the other when landed. Jeff Benson jbenso1@towson.edu (21 years ago, 8-Apr-03, to lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: I'd drop a pin, but it might be too much for our ears.
|
|
(...) Jefflien (21 years ago, 8-Apr-03, to lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: I'd drop a pin, but it might be too much for our ears.
|
|
(...) Sorry for responding to my own post ... Anne: I got your email, but I keep getting "error" messages back telling me they aren't being sent. The link is: (URL) - Towson's mascot is a Tiger :D (21 years ago, 8-Apr-03, to lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: New Fad?
|
|
(...) Ok. I have to strongly disagree here. In my legoverse landing gear is an easily exploitable weakness on military ships. Landing gear on my military ships (any size that can land) is always built directly into the hull of the ship to eliminate (...) (21 years ago, 8-Apr-03, to lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: SNEAK PEEK (was Re: I'd drop a pin...)
|
|
(...) Wow. The (what appears to be) a fairly small ship with the giant arm definately has my attention. -Mike Petrucelli (21 years ago, 8-Apr-03, to lugnet.space)
|
