|
|
 | | Re: Commodore MOC
|
| thanks joe, judging from the size of this thread... if you can call it that. Most people didn't know what to say about this MOC. I was really proud of the way it worked out and especially proud of the fantastic photos i got of it. I felt like i (...) (22 years ago, 7-Mar-03, to lugnet.space)
| | | | | Re: Commodore MOC
|
| (...) but (...) it (...) combine (...) right on! I totally appreciate your support. people like you, posting great, insightful and supportive comments are what is REALLY cool. thanks tons -tk (22 years ago, 7-Mar-03, to lugnet.space)
| | | | | Re: Grimlock Interceptor
|
| (...) Be sure to let me know if you do. I would love to incorporate more SNOT in my designs, but I'm SNOT deficient. :-) Until then, slopes are my friend. (...) It sort of came together because of space leftover from the engine compartment. I tried (...) (22 years ago, 7-Mar-03, to lugnet.space)
| | | | | Re: Grimlock Interceptor
|
| (...) Thanks, it actually started off as a rework of <set:6890>. I crossed that with my Sylph ((URL) and an unpublished shuttle. The result was the Grimlock. -Duane (22 years ago, 7-Mar-03, to lugnet.space)
| | | | | Re: Grimlock Interceptor
|
| (...) Thanks. That's what I was going for. I figured, that the bare necessities are all that's required - and that's what he got. (...) I tried making the engine beleiveable. After seeing a couple of specials on PBS about modern military aircraft, I (...) (22 years ago, 7-Mar-03, to lugnet.space)
|
|
