Subject:
|
RE: Bad image quality
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics.vc
|
Date:
|
Fri, 23 Mar 2001 10:51:53 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
<MARCO@SOPORCELavoidspam.PT>
|
Viewed:
|
7740 times
|
| |
|
|
Olá Alberto :)
PICTURES/SNAPSHOTS:
Try to use the camera in a *very well* illuminated room/environment.
From my experience with the VC, the quality (quantity?) of lighting is very
important to get better picture, after *manually* adjusting the focus (the
grey rubber ring), like Michael said.
I've seen better quality pictures taken with other WebCams like those from
Philips. :(
It's a pity we can't use, in some projects, the VC software with a camcorder
connected to the All-in-Wonder video input.
VIDEO CAPTURE:
The quality of VIDEO captured with VC also depends on the CPU speed.
With a PentiumIII@700MHz (320x240) it does an average capture.
Using a PentiumII@300MHz (320x240) the frame rate is not so good.
mc.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: news-gateway@lugnet.com
> [mailto:news-gateway@lugnet.com]On Behalf
> Of Michael Gasperi
> Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2001 10:41 PM
> To: lugnet.robotics.vc@lugnet.com
> Subject: Re: Bad image quality
>
> "Alberto Lopez" <alberto_lopez@iname.com> wrote in message
> news:G9J7yF.E76@lugnet.com...
> > Should I expect this poor quality or I may change the
> camera in the store ?
>
> I suppose I should ask the stupid question first. You do
> realize that you
> have to manually focus the camera? It is the rubber ring
> around the lens.
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Bad image quality
|
| "Alberto Lopez" <alberto_lopez@iname.com> wrote in message news:G9J7yF.E76@lugnet.com... (...) ? I suppose I should ask the stupid question first. You do realize that you have to manually focus the camera? It is the rubber ring around the lens. (...) (26 years ago, 1-Mar-01, to lugnet.robotics.vc)
|
3 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
