Subject:
|
Re: Bad image quality
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics.vc
|
Date:
|
Thu, 1 Mar 2001 22:41:03 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
4876 times
|
| |
|
|
"Alberto Lopez" <alberto_lopez@iname.com> wrote in message
news:G9J7yF.E76@lugnet.com...
> Should I expect this poor quality or I may change the camera in the store
?
I suppose I should ask the stupid question first. You do realize that you
have to manually focus the camera? It is the rubber ring around the lens.
Given that is not your problem, the image is never "high" quality. It never
looks as good as a digital camera for example. It usually looks like a
image that has been over compressed, or like a watercolor painting. Videos
will be not be smooth if you try the 640x400 size and maybe (depending on
how slow your PC is) 320x200.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | RE: Bad image quality
|
| Olá Alberto :) PICTURES/SNAPSHOTS: Try to use the camera in a *very well* illuminated room/environment. From my experience with the VC, the quality (quantity?) of lighting is very important to get better picture, after *manually* adjusting the focus (...) (24 years ago, 23-Mar-01, to lugnet.robotics.vc)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Bad image quality
|
| Hello everyone. I'm writting from spain so sorry if I write a bad english. ;-) I have installed correctly the software and camera. I haven't had any problem. However I obtain bad quality. (I have yet checked the point of 50 Hz). The image is not (...) (24 years ago, 1-Mar-01, to lugnet.robotics.vc)
|
3 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
