 | | Re: Robolab, byte codes and assembler
|
| (...) Two problems: 1. From what I've read about the problem, the speed I ran it at was right in the "sweet spot". 2. BrickOS would not qualify for the competition. I wonder if (hope?) the recent unavailability of rotation sensors at Pitsco is (...) (23 years ago, 26-Nov-03, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.robolab, FTX)
| | | | | Re: failure in communicaton between RCX & IR Tower
|
| Hey, Rob, that's what I was doing last night as well.. but I was installing the w2kpro as my virtual machine (VMWare). However, I ran into some system problem and I have to do this again today. If it works with the w2kpro on your toshiba satellite (...) (23 years ago, 26-Nov-03, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.robolab)
| | | | | Re: Robolab, byte codes and assembler
|
| (...) Don't run it too quickly or too slowly. (URL) Um, that's all I know, besides using BrickOS which has code to make it more accurate. You mentioned that already. Actually, now that I think about it, BrickOS might be able to run assembly language (...) (23 years ago, 26-Nov-03, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.robolab, FTX)
| | | | | Robolab, byte codes and assembler
|
| Having investigated rotations sensors thoroughly, I conclude they have some serious design flaws. Most notably, some samples taken during voltage transitions can be impossible to differentiate from samples at entirely different rotational positions. (...) (23 years ago, 26-Nov-03, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.robolab)
| | | | | Re: failure in communicaton between RCX & IR Tower
|
| "Elizabeth Mabrey" <emabrey@storming-robots.com> wrote in message news:HoMq73.B9J@lugnet.com... (...) I (...) ceased (...) I (...) OK, I have the problem fixed. You may not like the remedy, but it worked lastnight flawlessly. Oh, and the PCMCIA USB (...) (23 years ago, 26-Nov-03, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.robolab)
|
|
