 | | Re: pbForth vs RCX 1.0 —Mario Ferrari
| | | | "Mario Beaulieu" <mariobeaulieu@videotron.ca> writes... (...) Yes. I run pbForth on RCX 1.0, 1.5 and 2.0. No differences. (...) No, to my knowledge. In pbForth the IR port is entirely devoted to communication between the brick and the terminal. (...) (22 years ago, 27-Jun-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: pbForth vs RCX 1.0 —Mario Beaulieu
| | | | | Thanks, Just to make sure, let's take an example. Let's say that I have two RCX, named A and B. What if the program in RCX B is waiting for a character on the instruction KEY and RCX A sends a character, let's say '5' (ASCII 52) with 52 EMIT ? That (...) (22 years ago, 27-Jun-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
| | | | | | | | | | | | RE: pbForth vs RCX 1.0 —Ralph Hempel
| | | | | (...) What you describe would work exactly. Normally, the "outer interpreter" of pbForth waits for input using "KEY" - which of course is just a char from the IR. You can make a special word that waits for anything you like... Cheers, Ralph (22 years ago, 30-Jun-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
| | | | | | |
