To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforthOpen lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Robotics / RCX / pbFORTH / 354
353  |  355
Subject: 
Re: Is there a compatible h8 assembler for forth words?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth
Date: 
Sat, 20 May 2000 01:11:43 GMT
Reply-To: 
sjm@AVOIDSPAMjudgement.com
Viewed: 
1621 times
  
Ralph Hempel wrote:
From bitter experience, writing assembler stuff in Forth is generally
not worth it. I use Plaugher's rule:

Make it work, then make it fast.

A good rule. I just know I'm going to need fast so I am
planning ahead. Somehow I'm usually at the bleeding
edge of trying to squeeze everything possible out of
limited hardware.

I originally learned my Forth on a 68000 (Mac Forth on
the original 128k Mac.) I was already an experienced 68k
programmer at the time so when I had to drop into assembler
it wasn't such a bit problem. Of course I did make it work
first. And less than 10% of the words ended up in assembler.



Message is in Reply To:
  RE: Is there a compatible h8 assembler for forth words?
 
(...) No there is not. That being said, it's pretty easy to write one...if you have the time. I fiddled around with it a bit and then gave up since the GNU tools worked pretty quick. It was strictly a time/value exchange. From bitter experience, (...) (25 years ago, 19-May-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)

4 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR