 | | Re: Major breakthrough serial wise.
|
|
(...) I'm confusing everybody by asking questions that imply that I am changing existing code. I do not touch existing code. The question about where to enable the interrupt is a final cleanup one. It is not what I am doing now. I have not touched (...) (24 years ago, 5-Jun-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
|
| |
| | RE: Major breakthrough serial wise.
|
|
Soirry for the late reply, I've been on a sudden business trip and was unable to get to my email... (...) Great! I would leave the basic serial stuff alone and enable interrupt driven serial IO in a separate set of words, like RCX_INIT and (...) (24 years ago, 3-Jun-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
|
| |
| | is include included in pbforth?
|
|
Fist I would like to say that this pbforth is great. it realy enhance this toy. Now that i got this out of my chest... I notice that some of the examples included in the pbforth package use the word INCLUDE so I tried to use it but apparently (...) (24 years ago, 3-Jun-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
|
| |
| | Re: Major breakthrough serial wise.
|
|
in article 39365A56.86986217@nexen.com, Steve morris at smorris@nexen.com wrote on 6/1/00 5:43 AM: (...) Try posting this on a more general list if the following suggestions don't help: 1) put the RCX and tower underneath a box to block out all (...) (24 years ago, 1-Jun-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
|
| |
| | Major breakthrough serial wise.
|
|
I have been fiddling with serial interrupts with little success. Today I finally figured out that interrupts are masked in the CCR until you run the word RCX_INIT. I was blindly assuming that interrupts were generally enabled and I only had to deal (...) (24 years ago, 1-Jun-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
|
