 | | RE: IR-Tower and PowerBook-G3 ?
|
|
(...) This might sound stupid, but did you try it with the G3 attached to a wall wart? The reason I mention this is that my digital camera only downloads to my laptop if the laptop is plugged in to the wall. The laptop serial levels DO change (...) (25 years ago, 10-Aug-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | IR-Tower and PowerBook-G3 ?
|
|
Has anyone else had problems using the IR-Tower with a PowerBook-G3 (WallStreet '98)? I tried for two days and only got 'Problem talking to IR device' messages. Tried different cables, cont-checked both cables. Finally went and tried it on the GFs (...) (25 years ago, 10-Aug-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: NQC 2.0 ready for beta test
|
|
(...) Many of the changes were to make NQC similar to RCX Code (at least for the commands that RCX Code supports), and I believe RCX Code has a loose connection to the Lego Logo work. Dave (25 years ago, 10-Aug-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: NQC 2.0 ready for beta test
|
|
These new commands seem like Lego Logo. Dave Baum wrote in message ... (...) (25 years ago, 9-Aug-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: NQC 2.0 ready for beta test
|
|
I don't have any plans to write such a tool. Really quite a lot of work to build something stand-alone to do this. Should be reasonably easy from within perl, though. Dave (...) (25 years ago, 9-Aug-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: NQC 2.0 ready for beta test
|
|
Will it be possible someday to have an option to upconvert the programs? Dave Baum wrote in message ... (...) (25 years ago, 9-Aug-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: NQC 2.0 ready for beta test
|
|
(...) The topic comes up from time to time. I'm *way* too busy with other projects to extend the firmware, but if someone else wanted to, I'd be willing to extend NQC as needed. If someone else is seriously interested in taking on this work, please (...) (25 years ago, 7-Aug-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: NQC 2.0 ready for beta test
|
|
NQC seems perfect right now, thanks ! But well, now nqc has all the features suported by the original rcx firmware, it should be very interesting to modify the existing firmware, in order to add new features, but still keeping ease of use of NQC. I (...) (25 years ago, 7-Aug-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: How do you convert light sensor data to bmp image
|
|
What could very exiting is to create a win32 software with spirit.ocx which could display in realtime the image on your screen... I'll work at it when i'll get the mindstorm... ---...--- Philippe Jadin mailto:philippe.jadin@skynet.be Belgium, Europe (...) (25 years ago, 6-Aug-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | NQC 2.0 ready for beta test
|
|
See the "beta testing" section of the NQC site: (URL) documentation is still somewhat minimal, but it should be enough for people to get started. Dave Baum (25 years ago, 6-Aug-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc, lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: problem with control speed using NQC
|
|
The Mindstorms RCX Code software does the exact same thing as the code you listed, the only caveat is I think RCX Code uses power settings from 1 to 8 while NQC uses 0 to 7. Both result in the same bytecodes for the RCX to interpret. // turn A on (...) (25 years ago, 23-Jul-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: NQC emulator?
|
|
The idea has cropped up from time to time, but nobody has written one yet. You probably don't want to simulate NQC code, but rather interpret the bytecodes emitted by the NQC compiler. These are just the bytecodes of the standard Lego firmware. (...) (25 years ago, 23-Jul-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | NQC emulator?
|
|
Hello, it seems that the LegOS people have an emulator so that one can test programs "virtually", i.e. on your PC rather than the real RCX. Is there something similar available on the NQC side? (I need to kill the time until the Mindstorm kit (...) (25 years ago, 22-Jul-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: problem with control speed using NQC
|
|
But how does the original mindstorms software do it. With the Mindstorms software you can set the speed of each motor and it is obviously different. I must be missing something. I did a search on lugnet and found some NQC code to drive the motors (...) (25 years ago, 22-Jul-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: problem with control speed using NQC
|
|
The RCX uses pulse-width modulation to control power to the motor. The pulses are between 1ms and 8ms of power during an 8ms interval. In theory, this would result in different power being provided to the motor. The problem is that the motor has an (...) (25 years ago, 22-Jul-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: problem with control speed using NQC
|
|
I think that output power effects the modulation of the motor power. The motor power cycles on and off with the off time being longer at lower power settings. As David stated, this results in the same speed of the motor when it is unloaded for all (...) (25 years ago, 21-Jul-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: problem with control speed using NQC
|
|
I've had the same result. It seems an **unloaded** motor always runs at full speed. To explain it to myself, I've theorized that the 'p' (power) in Fwd() and OutputPower() is more akin to force and does not directly control velocity. Waiting for (...) (25 years ago, 21-Jul-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | problem with control speed using NQC
|
|
Okay, need some more help. I have the following code running. My expectation is that the speed of the motor would increase but the integer value in the 'Fwd' command doesn't seem to make any difference. The motor always runs at full speed. (...) (25 years ago, 21-Jul-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: NQC 1.3 released - Command Center?
|
|
(...) simple (...) has been released, check out his home page at: (URL) d/l it directly at: (URL) ya go. m. (25 years ago, 12-Jul-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Joystick Buttons
|
|
Has anyone figured out a way to utilize the buttons on the joystick? like maybe control another motor on top of the bot to turn an arm or something like that? -- Clay Aucoin (25 years ago, 7-Jul-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
