To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqcOpen lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Robotics / RCX / NQC / 536
535  |  537
Subject: 
Re: NQC Ignores based on your pbrink
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc
Date: 
Sun, 9 Apr 2000 05:43:55 GMT
Viewed: 
5356 times
  
Matthew Miller wrote:

> Dave Baum <dbaum@spambgoneenteract.com> wrote:
> > This being the case, I'd prefer to focus on the functionality and
> > practices of writing portable source.
> 
> This seems reasonable to me. Plus, it has the added benefit of being
> inherently open: source is all about "here's how to do this"; binaries are
> "here's a thing that does this". It's nice to encourage the first attitude.

I agree wholeheartedly. I don't want to see people selling their bot code.

It's all about sharing and learning.

Dean
--
Coin-Op's For Sale!: http://www.akasa.bc.ca/tfm/coin-op.html
Dean's Lego Workshop: http://www.akasa.bc.ca/tfm/lego_wr.html
Vancouver Lego Club: http://www.akasa.bc.ca/vlc



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: NQC Ignores based on your pbrink
 
(...) This seems reasonable to me. Plus, it has the added benefit of being inherently open: source is all about "here's how to do this"; binaries are "here's a thing that does this". It's nice to encourage the first attitude. (27 years ago, 9-Apr-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)  

10 Messages in This Thread:



Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR