Subject:
|
Re: NQC Ignores based on your pbrink
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc
|
Date:
|
Sun, 9 Apr 2000 04:06:17 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
mattdm@mattdm.orgSTOPSPAMMERS
|
Highlighted:
|
(details)
|
Viewed:
|
5465 times
|
| |
|
|
Dave Baum <dbaum@spambgoneenteract.com> wrote:
> This being the case, I'd prefer to focus on the functionality and
> practices of writing portable source.
This seems reasonable to me. Plus, it has the added benefit of being
inherently open: source is all about "here's how to do this"; binaries are
"here's a thing that does this". It's nice to encourage the first attitude.
--
Matthew Miller ---> mattdm@mattdm.org
Quotes 'R' Us ---> http://quotes-r-us.org/
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: NQC Ignores based on your pbrink
|
| (...) This first define (__RCX = 2) will happen automatically in NQC when you select RCX 2.0 as the target for compilation. Selecting an RCX 1.0 target will cause the symbol to be defined as 1. (...) I hope I don't have to add a __FIRMWARE symbol... (...) (27 years ago, 9-Apr-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
10 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
