Subject:
|
Re: NQC Ignores based on your pbrink
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc
|
Date:
|
Sat, 8 Apr 2000 17:26:28 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
mattdm@mattdm/spamcake/.org
|
Viewed:
|
1720 times
|
| |
|
|
Dean Husby <nntp@akasa.bc.ca> wrote:
> Dave Can you setup NQC to automatically ignore things a pbrink doesn't
> understand? For example The scout.
Coincidentally, I think someone just posted the answer to your question a
few hours ago....
<http://www.lugnet.com/robotics/rcx/nqc/?n=525>
--
Matthew Miller ---> mattdm@mattdm.org
Quotes 'R' Us ---> http://quotes-r-us.org/
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: NQC Ignores based on your pbrink
|
| (...) Yes, I agree with the approach to using __RCX for conditional compile - that's really why its there. I had thought about adding some of the functions (SetSensor() etc.) as no-ops in the Scout API, but this really didn't feel right to me. I (...) (24 years ago, 8-Apr-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | NQC Ignores based on your pbrink
|
| Dave Can you setup NQC to automatically ignore things a pbrink doesn't understand? For example The scout. I have a program that I use in my 2 RCX's and my 1 scout. But Constantly have to /* */ the offending code for the scout. Is there some way we (...) (24 years ago, 8-Apr-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
10 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
