| |
Dave Baum <dbaum@spambgoneenteract.com> wrote:
> 1) Have you considered porting the p-code interpreter used by Interactive C
> or something like a stripped down Java bytecode interpreter instead? The
> idea here would be that the RCX bytcodes are seriously crippled, and rather
> then hacking our way up the chain, why not start with something that was
> designed for more power up front. Also with either solution you'd get
> ready-made tools with Interactive C or a Java compiler.
To me, one of the important features of such a thing would be compatibility
with the existing firmware. Otherwise, why not just use LegOS?
--
Matthew Miller ---> mattdm@mattdm.org
Quotes 'R' Us ---> http://quotes-r-us.org/
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: NQC wishlist
|
| If anyone is seriously considering this I'd ask two things... 1) Have you considered porting the p-code interpreter used by Interactive C or something like a stripped down Java bytecode interpreter instead? The idea here would be that the RCX (...) (25 years ago, 4-Jan-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx, lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
9 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
