Subject:
|
Re: NQC listing mnemonics
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc
|
Date:
|
Wed, 8 Dec 1999 20:45:41 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1990 times
|
| |
|
|
Hello Dave ... Santa just brought Scouts for both of my sons ... and
of course he couldn't resist secretly opening one of the boxes. This
led to his downloading the Scout SDK ... and staying up all night!
Santa wholeheartedly votes for adding full NQC support for the Scout,
and if practical, converting NQC to use the "official" LEGO mnemonics.
Given the success of the RCX, Scout, and MicroScout I'd expect TLG to
further pursue computerized LEGO set development ... so it seems only
sensible to conform to their standards as far as possible.
Thanks again for your contributions to the LEGO community!
- Nick -
PS: I agree with Santa and also vote for adopting the LEGO mnemonics.
- N -
Dave Baum wrote:
>
> I have started looking at adding Scout support to NQC, and in the process
> I am questioning whether or not to change the mnemonics used in the
> disassembly listings (the -l option for nqc). Currently, I use a set
> mnemonics that I made up when writing NQC. Now, however, we have a list
> of "official" mnemonics from Lego (as part of the Scout SDK). Should I
> keep the old mnemonics or use the new ones?
>
> For example, here are some of the old ones:
>
> 000 Set var[0], 0 14 00 02 00 00
> 005 OutPwr ABC, 7 13 07 02 07
> 009 OutDir ABC, Fwd e1 87
>
> According to the lego mnemonics, this would be
>
> 000 setv var[0], 0 14 00 02 00 00
> 005 pwr ABC, 7 13 07 02 07
> 009 dir ABC, Fwd e1 87
>
> Anyone have any strong feelings here? I suspect only a few people look at
> the listings anyway, but they are probably used to the old names.
> However, using the new names would provide more commonality with the Scout
> SDK. I really don't want to support both (too much feature creep already
> in NQC).
>
> Dave Baum
>
> --
> reply to: dbaum at enteract dot com
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: NQC listing mnemonics
|
| (...) As a kid I remember getting a few gifts from Santa with batteries already installed. Took me a couple of years to catch on that this only seemed to happen with the coolest gifts, and that my dad inexplicably always knew exactly how they worked (...) (25 years ago, 9-Dec-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | NQC listing mnemonics
|
| I have started looking at adding Scout support to NQC, and in the process I am questioning whether or not to change the mnemonics used in the disassembly listings (the -l option for nqc). Currently, I use a set mnemonics that I made up when writing (...) (25 years ago, 4-Dec-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
8 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
