 | | Re: newbie again part 2 —Dave Baum
| | | | Actually, I wouldn't recommend using the simulator. My original intention was to develop the core of a simulator thus enabling other people to make a full-fledged application with nice menus and dialog boxes. Since that hasn't happened, the (...) (23 years ago, 17-Jan-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
| | | | | | | | | | ...2 years later... :-) (was: newbie again part 2) —Martin Erdelen
| | | | | Hello All, In lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc, Dave Baum wrote (almost two years ago, Thu, 17 Jan 2002 00:34:56 GMT -- your words are cherished, Dave! :-): (...) [...] (...) Well, I am not (yet) a Java programmer, but try to become one, and would like to (...) (21 years ago, 8-Jan-04, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: ...2 years later... :-) (was: newbie again part 2) —Dave Baum
| | | | | (...) It's been a long time since I looked at any of this, but I don't think the version of the NQC compiler is an issue, nor is the -1 option. The .rcx file format has been pretty stable for a long time. The -1 allows old source programs to be (...) (21 years ago, 9-Jan-04, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: ...2 years later... :-) (was: newbie again part 2) —Martin Erdelen
| | | | | Hello, and thanks for the reply. In lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc, Dave Baum wrote: . . . (...) That's where I thought it was, but who knows. I'll continue the quest. Thanks again -- as always I am impressed how easy it is on the Net to get to the roots (...) (21 years ago, 9-Jan-04, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: ...2 years later... :-) (was: newbie again part 2) —Martin Erdelen
| | | | | Hello, for the benefit of the next guy reading this thread (probably in January 2006 :-) : Dave was right, the *.rcx file I was trying to feed to pbsim wasn't in the current directory. (I didn't notice that my Java environment, jEdit, had set the (...) (21 years ago, 10-Jan-04, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
| | | | | | |
