 | | RE: Revisions to RcxCC —Marco Correia
| | | | I've tested your RcxCC version, and it works great with RCX2 (AFAIK). (ah, and still works simultaneously with CyberMaster too, eheh) That reminds me, one very useful thing for people working with various pBricks simultaneously (like myself), would (...) (23 years ago, 9-Apr-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Revisions to RcxCC, Join Forces ! —Stef Mientki
| | | | | | (...) That's a very good idea, JOIN FORCES (1+1>2) , divide the work and release your source codes, and make RCXcc alomost as popular as LINUX. Maybe sometimes in the future, when I've more time available, I'll join you. (...) Stef Mientki (23 years ago, 9-Apr-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Revisions to RcxCC —Dave Baum
| | | | | (...) Yeah, that went away as soon as I started using the RCX 2.0 locals for variable allocation - the symbolic information just didn't survive the rework. And I completely forgot to put it back in. I'm working on enhancing the listing a bit. I'll (...) (23 years ago, 10-Apr-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
| | | | | | | | | | | | RE: Revisions to RcxCC —Marco Correia
| | | | | Ah :) That would be great ! It's very usefull for "debuging" Thxs, :) mc. (...) (23 years ago, 10-Apr-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
| | | | | | |
