 | | Re: Yet another Q: IR messages
|
|
Thanks for the information so far. Is there any NQC command similar to the RCX-code "wait until message"-block? --Tobias (24 years ago, 30-Mar-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | "Speed" of control statments
|
|
I have been currently working on a control program that necessitates the highest reaction time possible. Does anyone what the fastest control statements would be using NQC (making the outputs react to sensor values as fast as possible)? i.e. Which (...) (24 years ago, 30-Mar-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: Yet another Q: IR messages
|
|
To send a message use the following: SendMessage(<variable> or <number>); The variable must be of integer type between 1 - 255 The number must be between 1 - 255 To read a message from the IR port do <variable> = Message(); This will put whatever (...) (24 years ago, 29-Mar-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: Yet another Q: IR messages
|
|
Hi Tobias, this could look something like this for example : int global_message; // place to store and read messages for every task task main() { start Read_Messages; // start Receive_Message Task while(true) { switch (global_message) { case 1 : (...) (24 years ago, 29-Mar-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Yet another Q: IR messages
|
|
I can't figure out how to use the IR commands. I've tried, read a bit in the documentation, but still have no clue. I'd like to know how to: a) Send a message (and decide what message it should be) and b) learn how to recieve messages Thanks in (...) (24 years ago, 29-Mar-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | RE: Electrical Data Link between 2 RCXs
|
|
(...) Hi :) (...) Heheh, my feelings exactly before "bumping" into LUGnet community almost a year and a half ago ;) Ok, now, about the way I use Timer() and will try to use FastTimer() or counter loop if proven more effective. I have no need to get (...) (24 years ago, 28-Mar-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc, lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Electrical Data Link between 2 RCXs
|
|
Hi Dean, thanks for your interesting idea for a reduction of transmission time. I will deal with that as soon as possible. Your questions: (...) Version 2.0 (...) No. Do you think that is faster? (...) No, just the transmission program. (...) Good (...) (24 years ago, 28-Mar-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: Electrical Data Link between 2 RCXs
|
|
Hi Marco, it is always interesting how many other people in the world do have the same problems or are dealing with the same subject. Sometimes I had the feeling that I dealt with "exotic" problems but then I realized that other "Mindstormers" had (...) (24 years ago, 28-Mar-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc, lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | RE: Electrical Data Link between 2 RCXs
|
|
Hi Bernd :) I see we're working in the same subject here :) *great* If you care to browse lugnet.robotics old thread "VLL *input* for RCX/CyberMaster (in NQC) ?" or the newer one, starting with "CM-RCX" (the subject had some variations) Your (...) (24 years ago, 27-Mar-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc, lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Electrical Data Link between 2 RCXs
|
|
Thanks for the info on the electric datalink. It's a clever idea that I never would have thought of myself. It seems to me that you could cut down on your transmission time if you changed the shape of your pulse train. The pauses between bits don't (...) (24 years ago, 26-Mar-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
