 | | Re: Battery voltage available within NQC?
|
|
(...) If you REALLY wanted to do this, you could use the bytecode to broadcast the battery information to the IR tower and have a service running on the PC which would recieve the battery message and then send an appropriate message back to the RCX. (...) (26 years ago, 12-Mar-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: Battery voltage available within NQC?
|
|
(...) There's a bytecode (0x30) that instructs the RCX to send the battery voltage as a response over the IR. That's what NQC and Mindstorms use to read the battery voltage. I don't think this opcode has any effect within a program, or at best it (...) (26 years ago, 12-Mar-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Battery voltage available within NQC?
|
|
Last night I went out and bought six C cell nicads and wired them up as a power supply for my robot. What I'm wondering is this: is there some way to programmatically obtain the battery voltage, so I could make a decision based on a voltage (...) (26 years ago, 11-Mar-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | RcxCC version 2.2 available
|
|
I am happy to announce the public release of version 2.2 of RCX Command Center. RCX Command Center is a Windows (95, 98, NT) program that assist you in programming the Lego MindStorms or CyberMaster Robots. It provides a higher level interface to (...) (26 years ago, 10-Mar-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc, lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: RcxCC for NQC 1.1?
|
|
I have not done extensive testing but it worked for me. Replaced nqcc.exe and nqc.h with the new versions 1.2. (...) (26 years ago, 9-Mar-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | NQC 1.2 has been released
|
|
NQC Version 1.2 adds support for simple inline functions and basic expression evaluation. More details can be found at: (URL) (26 years ago, 9-Mar-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc, lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: RcxCC for NQC 1.1?
|
|
Can you simply replace the nqcc executable in the RcxCC directory with the new version? (...) (26 years ago, 8-Mar-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | RcxCC for NQC 1.1?
|
|
I just downloaded RcxCC and noticed that it is still using NQC 1.0b4 Was the RcxCC project abandoned? Why it still uses an outdated version of NQC? Are there any other good alternatives to RcxCC for the new NQC? Thanks Laurentino Martins (...) (26 years ago, 7-Mar-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: Compiling the compiler
|
|
(...) I've checked into this a little further. It comes down to something like the following: void foo(const char *p) { delete p; } On one hand, this is conceptually a violation of "constness" as a caller to foo() wouldn't know that the object (...) (26 years ago, 6-Mar-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: Compiling the compiler
|
|
(...) What file are you compiling when you get this error? I think the fix is to include "Symbol.h" before the array templates get instantiated, but it is curious that neither Metrowerks nor gcc complain. (...) Yes, a cast should be fine. Offhand, (...) (26 years ago, 5-Mar-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
