Subject:
|
Re: Command Line Length (and more)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos
|
Date:
|
Mon, 17 Jan 2000 20:24:57 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
898 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos, Rossz Vámos-Wentworth writes:
> It looks like I have most of the problems solved. However, one serious
> problem seems to be related to the length of the command line. Either
> "make" or the OS is truncating the command line to about 127 characters.
IIRC, command.com imposes that length limit (I'm assuming you're on a PC
here).
-Steven
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Command Line Length (and more)
|
| Steven Vore <svore@mindspring.com> wrote in message news:FoHy1L.G3p@lugnet.com... (...) I think the problem is in the make program. If I put the same command in a batch file (fully expanded command line) it works (both with command.com and (...) (24 years ago, 18-Jan-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Command Line Length (and more)
|
| It looks like I have most of the problems solved. However, one serious problem seems to be related to the length of the command line. Either "make" or the OS is truncating the command line to about 127 characters. This causes several module builds (...) (24 years ago, 17-Jan-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
4 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
