| |
Hi Luis,
Luis Villa wrote:
> I'm trying to use 0.2.1 and having problems- no executables are appearing
> in the demo/ directory. Stepping through the make, I can see that the
> .dc1, .dc2, etc. files are being made (whether or not correctly I have no
> idea.) Running make-lx correctly calls makelx-back (BTW, I thought no
> perl? can't do windows with perl...) but there are no .lx files being
I rewrote makelx-back - it's called makelx now, and it doesn't require
perl anymore. I just didn't post it yet, as it didn't merit a 0.2.2
release just yet. At least in my eyes.
For now, try and insert a line into makelx that prints out the arguments
to makelx-back, then run that from the command line. It should me more
informative.
Markus.
--
"Nieder mit den Zitaten!" -Markus L. Noga <markus@noga.de>
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: makelx issues
|
| (...) Hmm. Well, I'll put off testing on windows then- I don't have permission (I don't think) to put perl on those boxes. (...) It turns out that just putting the legOS/util in the path did the trick. I had asssumed that was just for convenience, (...) (25 years ago, 5-Nov-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | makelx issues
|
| I'm trying to use 0.2.1 and having problems- no executables are appearing in the demo/ directory. Stepping through the make, I can see that the .dc1, .dc2, etc. files are being made (whether or not correctly I have no idea.) Running make-lx (...) (25 years ago, 4-Nov-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
4 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
