| |
I'm trying to use 0.2.1 and having problems- no executables are appearing
in the demo/ directory. Stepping through the make, I can see that the
.dc1, .dc2, etc. files are being made (whether or not correctly I have no
idea.) Running make-lx correctly calls makelx-back (BTW, I thought no
perl? can't do windows with perl...) but there are no .lx files being
created anywhere. After class I'll look through the source more
thoroughly. However, from a quick scan done while trying to figure out
what was going on, I can't see anything wrong. Also, all permissions are
correct. So- any idea anyone? Is anyone else even using 0.2.1 yet?
Similar problems? Hints? Clues?
Trying to figure things out-
Luis
#######################################################################
Profanity is the one language that all programmers understand.
-Anonymous
#######################################################################
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: makelx issues
|
| Hi Luis, (...) I rewrote makelx-back - it's called makelx now, and it doesn't require perl anymore. I just didn't post it yet, as it didn't merit a 0.2.2 release just yet. At least in my eyes. For now, try and insert a line into makelx that prints (...) (25 years ago, 5-Nov-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
4 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
