|
|
 | | Re: Wire communication
|
| (...) Hi, yep it does. Regards Ronald (20 years ago, 15-Dec-04, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
| | | | | Re: Wire communication
|
| A few questions and another answer: I don’t have my nqc ref to hand, but does the one external output on the cybermaster support float? I also have the suspicion that a more efficient (fewer ports tied up) solution might be achieved by wiring two (...) (20 years ago, 14-Dec-04, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
| | | | | Re: brickOS port to FreeBSD
|
| (...) I think the latest official gcc-binaries for brickOS are still 2.95.x. However, I have binutils-2.15 and gcc-3.4.0 running under linux and had only minor problems. Make sure you compile gcc without the stdc++ libraries or just ignore the (...) (20 years ago, 9-Dec-04, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
| | | | | Re: Wire communication
|
| (...) I think all you really need to do is switch the motor port between "float" and "brake". That's the same as opening and closing a touch sensor. I've used that for simple signals, and it seems to work fine, but I haven't tried more complex (...) (20 years ago, 9-Dec-04, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
| | | | | Wire communication
|
| Hello, I am currently trying to implement a communication protocol between two bricks using just one of the copper wire given with the brick. The protocol is based on manchester encoding, using a well-timed alternation of up and low signals. My (...) (20 years ago, 9-Dec-04, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
|
