Subject:
|
Re: brickOS port to FreeBSD
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos
|
Date:
|
Thu, 9 Dec 2004 16:26:45 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
6824 times
|
| |
|
|
On Wednesday 08 December 2004 16:39, John Hay wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm looking at porting brickOS to FreeBSD. I guess the first step is to get the
> crosscompiler etc. going. Which version of gcc and binutils is the best to use?
I think the latest official gcc-binaries for brickOS are still 2.95.x.
However, I have binutils-2.15 and gcc-3.4.0 running under linux and had only minor
problems. Make sure you compile gcc without the stdc++ libraries or just ignore
the errors. I think there was one bug in the binutils-Makefile that was easy to
fix (missing -I($srcdir) option for syslex.o in binutils/binutils/Makefile).
In that case you should apply my gcc-3.3 patch, which fixes some bugs and
warnings in brickOS that the new gcc/binutils complain about. You can find it at
http://hoenicke.ath.cx/rcx/brickOS/
Most changes in this patch are related to the new binutils not gcc, though.
Regards,
Jochen
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: brickOS port to FreeBSD
|
| (...) Thanks, I'm up and running using binutils-2.15, gcc-3.4-20041217 and your gcc-3.3 patch to the cvs version of brickOS. I also have the USB Tower working. Would the brickOS guys be interested in FreeBSD patches to firmdl and dll? John (20 years ago, 23-Dec-04, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | brickOS port to FreeBSD
|
| Hi, I'm looking at porting brickOS to FreeBSD. I guess the first step is to get the crosscompiler etc. going. Which version of gcc and binutils is the best to use? I searched a bit but it isn't very clear which version to use, except that lots of (...) (20 years ago, 8-Dec-04, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
6 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
